Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
opcorn:
opcorn: no hamantash emoticon so I will settle for popcorn
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
opcorn:
You said there be a Filistine yet the Filistinians claim the land by right just like the Jews so you are being a hypocrite saying the Jews cannot claim it by right yet the Filistinians can.
Keyword being "WAS". The Native Americans fought to keep their land and lost. If they came back and tried to claim it by birthright, they would still have to fight to retake it. You couldn't fault the people who live in the US now for fighting to defend their homes.Native Americans did not have countries either but it was still their land.
They're doing it right now as we speak. Land that is currently inhabited by Palestinians is being destroyed to make room for new Jewish settlements all the time. This is why the green on the other map gets progressively smaller. It doesn't matter who the land belonged to thousands of years ago.Jews did not invade on Filistinian land and this is fact.
This is irrelevant. There is no such thing as "natural territory". Having lived there before does not mean they have a right to the land. If you got evicted from your apartment and had to move to another, do you have the right to go back to your old apartment and tell the new tenants to move out?The general area called Israel has always been the area the Jews occupied and considering the Filistinians are already Jordanian then how can their natural territory be another?
I suggest "Recognizing Zionism" series by Mr Raefipour. It is very informative..
Never heard of it. Sounds interesting, I'll give it a read.
I've got a lot of time to do it now since nobody wants to continue the debate
I do not mean to sound like a quitter but I have debated this topic so many times as it was a pivotal point in my departure from Islam it is unsettling to continue it.
I have read your other responses and all I can say is that I have seen such claims before and I can already see their faults.
This debate is truly just something I have gotten tired of I no longer have the energy for it.
I'm honestly curious to hear what the faults in my arguments are, particularly the last one (post #23), which sounds exactly like Zionism to me. No pressure though
Oh, just for the sake of having someone publicly say it (and perhaps in a fit of masochism) I'll just go ahead and note that all this anti-Zionist claptrap is just that. It's absurd political propaganda, and is either magnificently ignorant or anti-Semitic, one of the two.
I especially liked the part about how Ashkenazim (European Jews) "aren't really Jews" or that converts "aren't really Jews" either.
What a load of poisonous horse crap....
Now this I agree with. Not to mention that the majority of "Jews" who live in Israel are secular (which is a contradictory term when applied to religion in my opinion) and not traditional Jews.For or Against?
I am opposed to Zionism for 2 reasons:
1)The only reason the Jews were given Israel was because they were oppressed by the Nazis. I find it hypocritical that they would turn around and do essentially the same thing to the Palestinians.
2)Zionism claims that Israel belongs to the Jews by right of birth, but the majority of displaced Jews in Israel are of European descent and just happen to follow the Jewish religion. They have no more of a "blood" claim to Israel than I do.
I didn't say they aren't Jews, I said they have no genealogical ties to the land. Also, how can you accuse me of racism for being against entitlement?
This is essentially like me kicking you out of your own house and locking you out after a period of years with you constantly trying to get in. Just because I have made it my home does not mean you have no right to your house.
Oh, just for the sake of having someone publicly say it (and perhaps in a fit of masochism) I'll just go ahead and note that all this anti-Zionist claptrap is just that. It's absurd political propaganda, and is either magnificently ignorant or anti-Semitic, one of the two.
I especially liked the part about how Ashkenazim (European Jews) "aren't really Jews" or that converts "aren't really Jews" either.
What a load of poisonous horse crap....
THEY HAVE JEWISH BLOOD AND HAVE ANCESTORS WHICH HAVE BEEN KICKED OUT OF THEIR LAND!
Sorry about the yelling but your going against what you aid earlier about the Basque
Converts do???
No, it's not. None of the original people (to whom these homes belong) conquered by the Palestinians are alive to take their homes back, because it happened centuries ago. It would be more like if you kicked me out of my house 500 years ago and passed it down through your family, and out of nowhere my great-great-great, etc. grandchildren fell on hard times, then decided to kick your descendants out of the house in my name, even though I'm long dead and the house has been your family's residence for quite some time. Again, I refer you to post 23 and the example I posed there. Do I have more right to Navarre than the modern day Spaniards because my ancestors were conquered and removed from their land 800 years ago?
You did not reference converts you said European Jew which may have implied converts but more then enough European Jews are Jewish by ethnicity
I didn't say they aren't Jews, I said they have no genealogical ties to the land.
Also, how can you accuse me of racism for being against entitlement?