That was a dodge, not a response. What is your answer to her question?paarsurrey said:Didn't you see my response in Post #106 ? Please
Regards
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That was a dodge, not a response. What is your answer to her question?paarsurrey said:Didn't you see my response in Post #106 ? Please
Regards
There certainly is no way of knowing what we will be able to achieve.And some day we may learn how to literally create an atom. Jus' sayin'...
He said we "may learn", not we "will learn". There is no reason to assume limitation on our future scientific progress, is there?On what basis, it is just a conjecture. Please
Regards
You merely answered a question with another question in post #106. You haven't answered Willamena's or Columbus' questions as of yet. You just keep on responding to questions with further questions.Didn't you see my response in Post #106 ? Please
Regards
Which is par for the course when in discussions with religious fanatics like @paarsurreyYou merely answered a question with another question in post #106. You haven't answered Willamena's or Columbus' questions as of yet. You just keep on responding to questions with further questions.
In a way they do each time they use the colliders. They collide particles and produce new particles. They've even produced elements that doesn't exist naturally in the universe (like Uup, perhaps they've changed the name now, since Uup stood for simply for element 115).And some day we may learn how to literally create an atom. Jus' sayin'...
I believe that the reason @paarsurrey is avoiding her question is because the answer is "yes". The OP has been thoroughly and repeatedly answered.You merely answered a question with another question in post #106.
I wasn't going to say that, but there is certainly truth to it.In a way they do each time they use the colliders. They collide particles and produce new particles. They've even produced elements that doesn't exist naturally in the universe (like Uup, perhaps they've changed the name now, since Uup stood for simply for element 115).
I was only being sarcastic, given that ridiculously misused saying is used so often as a sort of "gotcha" by some of the more fundamental Creationists.Could you explain the argument?
Anyone who has nursed a baby knows what leibowde84 said is accurate.Science confirms you wrong.
Did you even read this article?You don't even trust the scientific observations.
http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/435110/Healthy-babies-suck-thumb-in-womb
Yes.Did you read Post #111, please.
Regards
I believe that the reason @paarsurrey is avoiding her question is because the answer is "yes". The OP has been thoroughly and repeatedly answered.
Recognition of that makes his religious beliefs appear founded upon poor thought processes.
Tom
Did you even read this article?
Here is the opinion I have about why you don't answer her question.
Tom
It is obvious that you did not read the article, as it does not make the claim that fetuses suck their thumb in the womb. The title is misleading, but if you actually read the article, it merely describes fetuses touching certain parts of their face and such. No "sucking" is mentioned. All you have to do is read a bit. Is that too much to ask?The article says Healthy babies suck thumb in womb
So babies learnt how to suck while still in the womb.
Then, please explain why you have refused to answer her questions. If you don't want people coming up with their own theories about why you are refusing to answer, then answer the damn question.Your opinion is simply wrong. Please
Regards
It is obvious that you did not read the article, as it does not make the claim that fetuses suck their thumb in the womb. The title is misleading, but if you actually read the article, it merely describes fetuses touching certain parts of their face and such. No "sucking" is mentioned. All you have to do is read a bit. Is that too much to ask?
No need to explain it in the article as the title put it in short, but if you need it to be mentioned straight
then i have no problem to bring to you multiple articles.
Fourth month
Your baby may suck its thumb now. By 14 weeks your baby will be about 9-10 cm long. Its body is now covered with a layer of fine hair called lanugo. By 16 weeks its face is becoming more human in appearance, although the chin is small and the mouth is quite wide. Between 16 and 24 weeks you should feel your baby move for the first time — it may at first feel like butterflies.
http://www.mydr.com.au/babies-pregnancy/baby-s-development-in-the-womb
Week Thirteen: Baby flexes and kicks
You are 13 weeks pregnant. (fetal age 11 weeks)
http://www.baby2see.com/development/week13.html
- The fetus has grown to about 3 inches (8cm) long.
- Weight approximately 1 ounce (25 grams).
- Bone is beginning to replace cartilage and the ribs are appearing.
- The nose and chin are well defined.
- Movements can be measured.
- The child will begin to learn to suck its thumb.
- The child can open and close its mouth.
- The external genitalia are almost defined, it may be possible to tell if baby is a boy or a girl.
The child will begin to learn to suck its thumb.