• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: If there's no God, then where did the word "God" come from?

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Exactly, but where's the teacher ?
Maybe there is no need for a teacher. Most likely, it has to do with sensations that the baby is having when putting his thumb in his mouth, or something along those lines. Why do you think that a teacher would be necessary? Think of all the things you learned to do on your own throughout your life.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Maybe there is no need for a teacher. Most likely, it has to do with sensations that the baby is having when putting his thumb in his mouth, or something along those lines. Why do you think that a teacher would be necessary? Think of all the things you learned to do on your own throughout your life.

Such as learning how to erect the penis ?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
The article says Healthy babies suck thumb in womb

So babies learnt how to suck while still in the womb.
It doesn't. You should read it.

And besides, making a sucking motion and knowing how to latch onto a nipple and suck to obtain milk aren't the same thing.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
And knowing the need to swallow than throwing it away.:rolleyes:
You said this, right?

"Did babies learn how to suck milk once they born due to experience"

You got your answer.

And babies don't "throw it away." If you've ever seen a baby nurse, they dribble the milk all over the place and usually fall asleep on a milk high.
 
Last edited:

Midnight Rain

Well-Known Member
Humans could neither create an atom nor a word both are work of God , in real sense.
Regards

P.S.
atom (n.)
late 15c., as a hypothetical indivisible body, the building block of the universe, from Latin atomus (especially in Lucretius) "indivisible particle," from Greekatomos "uncut, unhewn; indivisible," from a- "not" + tomos "a cutting," from temnein "to cut" (see tome). An ancient term of philosophical speculation (in Leucippus, Democritus), revived 1805 by British chemist John Dalton. In late classical and medieval use also a unit of time, 22,560 to the hour. Atom bomb is from 1945 as both a noun and a verb; compare atomic.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=atom

Science has borrowed it lately from language as it has no language of its own.
Not an atheist but this is just a silly argument. If dragons didn't exist then where did the word "Dragons" come from? I mean this could be applied to anything. I don't want to be rude or shame anyone but does this really seem like a viable argument from any worldview point?
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Not an atheist but this is just a silly argument. If dragons didn't exist then where did the word "Dragons" come from? I mean this could be applied to anything. I don't want to be rude or shame anyone but does this really seem like a viable argument from any world-view point?
What do you think is a viable argument? Kindly give your own understanding of it. Please
Regards
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
leibowde84 said:
Then, please explain why you have refused to answer her questions. If you don't want people coming up with their own theories about why you are refusing to answer, then answer the damn question.
Im sorry, that. Was funny. Carry on.
I had given the answers to the person who asked the question, and I have quoted the posts numbers. I agree it is funny.
Regards
 
Top