You think in monochrome.
If somebody has wealth, they can spend it in charity in preference to exploiting others.
Sorry but you claimed eradicating usury and religion, would solve global warming, and this bs ad hominem doesn't remotely justify that claim. I fail to see how destroying the global capitalist economy,
no matter how much its injustices bunch your panties, is going to help stop global warming? Ironically no amount of asking you has proffered anything tangible to justify your absurd claim.
Money is not a commodity. It is a medium to equate value to goods and services.
Money isn't real, it is an abstract concept. You might want to read Karl Marx on this, "all property is theft". His ideologies are very simpatico with youthful idealism. Be warned, he was an atheist...
Tinkering with money is not productive, it is an immoral way of increasing one's wealth, in a similar way to pyramid selling. There has to be losers.
So economics one assumes is a pointless pursuit, well leaving aside your dismissive hand waving, I think maybe you might need to offer something in it's place first, unless global genocide is your aim? Talk about sawing the branch you're on, dear oh dear.
It is an exploitation of those that are poor by those that have.I don't care how you wish to disguise it, the result is the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. The only thing that can eventually happen is envy and enmity.
1. Where have I disguised it?
2. What is the alternative you think will work?
3. You do make me laugh fair play, no offence.
What is the alternative? Stop ripping people off. Nothing more, and nothing less.
That is not an alternative, that is idealistic wishful thinking,
how is it to be achieved? I will give you a clue here, destroying the system we have, because you don't like it, won't magically produce a better one, geddit yet?
Private banks should be heavily regulated. They should not be allowed to make excessive profit from usurious transactions such as credit cards etc.
Sorry, but I couldn't hear you for the sound of the goal posts you just moved.
You seem to have moved from your original claim of eradicating usury, with no explanation of what you planned to replace capitalism with, since credit is essential to capitalism, and usury essential to credit. To making vague assertions about banking regulation...
And of course, still no explanation of how religion, and not science, is going to solve climate change?