Sheldon said:
↑
This is not an argument against people having the right to end their life with dignity and without unnecessary suffering and pain. You are simply conflating the fact that such laws might be open to abuse or misuse if they don't include proper safe guards, with not having them at all, but we could simply include such safeguards then, problem solved, and no histrionics required.
You have also not offered anything to support your claimed stat, search the paper online and the story try and fact check it, only the claims seems extremely dubious. All you have is an anecdotal claim, you do see how that looks in the context of a debate?