3rdAngel
Well-Known Member
God is my judge not you. I suggest you read Romans 2:1-11 and prove your claims. It is not being deceitful to tell the truth (see John 17:17; Romans 3:4)Why would I want to be deceitful like you are being.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
God is my judge not you. I suggest you read Romans 2:1-11 and prove your claims. It is not being deceitful to tell the truth (see John 17:17; Romans 3:4)Why would I want to be deceitful like you are being.
‘Prove your posts are wrong!!’
3rdAngel, almost EVERYTHING your post claims IS WRONG…. Proving your posts as wrong will take more pages than there are in the Bible… and that’s why you say, ‘Prove my posts are wrong!!’
No, you ran away from our discussion because you were losing. Pretending does not help you.Sorry I do not believe you. I am still here debating scripture. I do not believe you have been able to support a single claim in our discussion and when pushed with evidence against you then you seek to make the discussion personal.
That is not what a discussion or debate is about. A debate and discussion is about addressing the other persons post content and showing why you agree or disagree with evidence to support your belief. Now I know we will not agree on everything and that is ok with me. I think we can still be friendly in a discussion even if we might not agree on something.
I tell you what, I will continue to engage with you in a friendly manner if you agree to do the same. Lets be honest if we do not have the answers to the posts shared with you its ok. Lets keep it friendly ok? What do you say? Want to start over with a friendly discussion?
Sorry I do not believe you so we will agree to disagree. Take Care.No, you ran away from our discussion because you were losing. Pretending does not help you.
And I am always friendly. But the question is can you admit when you are wrong?
And there you go being disingenuous again. That is not proper Christian behavior. One need not be a doormat to be a Christian, but one should be willing to be honest.Sorry I do not believe you so we will agree to disagree. Take Care.
That’s absolutely right : it certainly is not deceitful to tell the truth.God is my judge not you. I suggest you read Romans 2:1-11 and prove your claims. It is not being deceitful to tell the truth (see John 17:17; Romans 3:4)
The above is the last part of a post you made earlier.There can be little doubt that Paul viewed Jesus, the Son, as closely connected with God, the Father. That they were not two distinct individuals said to be the creators of the heavens and the earth and all mankind. But that together, they were the one God
No! You answer the question I asked you that you didn’t reply to, first!!I see so you cannot prove my posts wrong can you. Your just going to quote you over the scriptures that are Gods' Words that are in disagreement with you. For me only God's Words are true and we should believe and follow them according to Romans 3:4 and Acts 5:29. You quoting you is not Gods' Word but your words denying Gods' Word. Lets discuss the scripture details. Address my post content and show me why you disagree in detail and lets discuss.
Dear oh dear, some Christians can be annoying!No you haven't you built a paper dragon to tear down making claims to things I never made. Your post here in regards to 1 Corinthians 8:6 was answered in good faith in the last two posts I have made. If you are unable to address my post content just be honest and say so. Or in good faith address my posts in detail as I do yours showing why you agree of disagree. If you cannot address the posts just say so. Show some common courtesy. If you want me to address your posts in detail at least you can do the same as well.
It is no hard thing that anyone should think anything else except if they are being deceived or desire to deceive: Jesus was merely stating that they agreed as of ‘One Will’.The problem with the Bible is that if one cherry picks verses is that either side of the trinity claim appears to be correct. That means one should try to use a broader context. Quote mining one's own Bible is not a good tactic. So when Jesus said "The Lord and I are one" did he mean that they were the same person or merely that they agreed?
Dear oh dear, some Christians can be annoying!
You're over a barrel. If honesty were a Christian trait ─ instead of a mere debating option ─ you'd be up-front and say, "Yes, Paul clearly distinguishes Jesus ("Lord") from the Father ("God"), since in Judaism there's only one God."
You might like to experiment, and see whether you can learn anything from debating honestly, but that might take the fun out of it for you. Equally I can point you towards the clear water of truthfulness, and ….
Have you ever met anyone who agreed on anything during a DEBATE? Or did you mean ‘Discussion’?… urge the view that the point of debate is to learn ─ but only you can choose to drink, and to think.
I do not think that people do that on purpose. Beliefs can be complex. For example when I was still a Christian I understood that all of the evidence tells us that there was no Flood of Noah. I could not imagine God going around planting false evidence everywhere. That would be a form of lying. And since God could not lie there could not have been a flood of Noah. Bible beliefs can get complicated when one has to interact with the real world.It is no hard thing that anyone should think anything else except if they are being deceived or desire to deceive: Jesus was merely stating that they agreed as of ‘One Will’.
Jesus always give way to the Will of the Father: YHWH God. And in doing so it is for sure then that they would always agree AS ONE.
I think there are those who do wrong things ‘on purpose’. It is an amusement to them to do this.I do not think that people do that on purpose. Beliefs can be complex. For example when I was still a Christian I understood that all of the evidence tells us that there was no Flood of Noah. I could not imagine God going around planting false evidence everywhere. That would be a form of lying. And since God could not lie there could not have been a flood of Noah. Bible beliefs can get complicated when one has to interact with the real world.
And do you not see a problem with your claim about agreeing? I am sure that the OP is Christian, but he will disagree with.
Jesus gave the Apostles the right and obligation to make changes as needed, and they in turn did the same.Gelling back to the OP is anyone able to prove from the scriptures that Sunday is "the Lords day" of Revelation 1:10? I am guessing that is a no?
Only God’s word are true and we should believe and follow them. That’s what you say?I see so you cannot prove my posts wrong can you. Your just going to quote you over the scriptures that are Gods' Words that are in disagreement with you. For me only God's Words are true and we should believe and follow them according to Romans 3:4 and Acts 5:29. You quoting you is not Gods' Word but your words denying Gods' Word. Lets discuss the scripture details. Address my post content and show me why you disagree in detail and lets discuss.
Honestly, what IS ‘The Lord’s Day”?Jesus gave the Apostles the right and obligation to make changes as needed, and they in turn did the same.
No thank you dear friend. You made the claims that my posts were wrong earlier. Show me the evidence. You quoting you over the scriptures is not evidence I am wrong. No go and prove your claims and address the content of my posts and prove to me why you think my posts are wrong and lets discuss the scripture details together. I will start in good faith and address your first post where you are mirco-quoting me out of context to my larger post that already addressed your question to start alright?No! You answer the question I asked you that you didn’t reply to, first!!
Sorry I do not believe you and yes I am being very genuine and honest in this claim and unlike you have shown why in all of our discussions together. Funny, I was an atheist and now a Christian. You a Christian who has departed the faith and now Atheist. We are indeed oppositesAnd there you go being disingenuous again. That is not proper Christian behavior. One need not be a doormat to be a Christian, but one should be willing to be honest. One thing to remember when debating an atheist is that many used to be Christians and that they became atheists due to a superior understanding of the Bible.
Really because they disagree with you and are able to show why they might disagree?Dear oh dear, some Christians can be annoying!
Well if you read my posts you would have seen that I clearly did state Paul as calling the father as God and Jesus as Lord referring to both of them as the God of creation. I was also able to show through the old testament scriptures what I believe that means from the Genesis account and compared Hebrew, Greek to English words used in 1 Corinthians 8:6 also showing how the Hebrew and Greek words can have plural application/ All I have heard back from you in regards to that posts is silence. You chose not to respond to it so there is nothing further I can say here in this regard. So in my view it is you (using your words) who is over the barrel here. The evidence is your not willing to address the content of my posts shared in good faith that are in disagreement with you and making paper dragons to tear down that no one is talking about so I guess we will agree to disagree here dear friend. You have already been provided scripture directly from the gospel writers and the Apostles all in agreement stating that Jesus is God verbatim in *John 1:1-4; 14; 1 John 5:20; John 20:28; Hebrews 1:8; 2 Peter 1:1; Titus 2:13. This is all in agreement with all my previous posts to you despite your claims to the contrary. No one has said that the Father is Jesus and Jesus is the Father. Jesus and the father however are one according to the scriptures in John 10:30 which can be shown all through the old and new testament scriptures as plural meaning.You're over a barrel. If honesty were a Christian trait ─ instead of a mere debating option ─ you'd be up-front and say, "Yes, Paul clearly distinguishes Jesus ("Lord") from the Father ("God"), since in Judaism there's only one God."
I find this a common problem in debates with some people. Sometimes it get to a stage when some people have no response for what is being shared with them. Instead of addressing the post content and having a friendly discussion they seek instead to close they eyes and ears because they have no answers and do not want to admit that they could be wrong about something. You can know these people because after a while when confronted with truth instead of continuing in a friendly discussion they seek to turn the discussion away from the messages being shared with them and seek to make the discussion all about the messenger. Sad really. Anyhow thanks for some discussion looks like we will agree to disagree. Take Care.You might like to experiment, and see whether you can learn anything from debating honestly, but that might take the fun out of it for you. Equally I can point you towards the clear water of truthfulness, and urge the view that the point of debate is to learn ─ but only you can choose to drink, and to think.