Argentbear
Well-Known Member
Examples?I watched the debate, and although I could easily tell when she was blatantly lying, I noticed that the moderators didn’t call her out on it even once.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Examples?I watched the debate, and although I could easily tell when she was blatantly lying, I noticed that the moderators didn’t call her out on it even once.
Two and a half years and how is that little coward Putin comming along with that invasion?This is Harris and all dems when Russia wins the war.
No.Is there a national sales tax level on all things that are sold
That was F1fan's term. I can say the same about Harris supporters.Not all.
(And "scum" wouldn't be my preferred term. Even the most treasonous, racist, misogynistic ******* on the planet is still a human being)
I know a few people who went full PPC (the Canadian equivalent of MAGA, roughly) after a brain injury. I don't fault people for their mental health symptoms, even if one of those symptoms is supporting horrible political causes.
And it seems like a lot of Trump supporters are just ignorant. I think it's harder for this ignorance to continue the longer we go, but still: there are a lot of people who support Trump without fully appreciating what they're doing.
But if you knowingly support what Trump does - all the anti-democratic bull****, all the xenophobia and racism, all the deliberate hurting of women, and on and on - how could you think this wouldn't reflect negatively on your character?
Who we vote for reflects on our character regardless of who we vote for. What about Harris's platform do you think reflects badly on her supporters?That was F1fan's term. I can say the same about Harris supporters.
True, if you do not vote then you have taken away your right to complain. In a two party system, where only one or the other has a chance to win and the odds of a third are almost zero one needs a good excuse for doing so.
I don't know why this page is acting this way and I don't have the fortitude to figure it out.I feel very comfortable with my choice.
Should we do the same thing to the United Nations, and only allow countries with most population decide for all? Right now, the UN has a sort of an international electoral college, where even the smallest nation has a vote. Should the first most populous countries, China, Indian, US, Indonesia and Pakistan always lead? Vatican City is the least populated country in the world; 764 people.Just out of academic curiosity, what is it exactly in the Democratic Party platform that you loath so much?
A Republic is a government formed by the people, and those who the people elect as their representatives.
The electoral college is a relic from the days of slavery, and effectively lets chunks of land (the two senators from each state) to get additional votes above and beyond the selection by the people.
So basically when Republicans spout that line that you have, they are saying that they don’t want the people to represent all of us in government, but instead they want the elitist politicians to have more power than the normal people.
Sorry, but that is in fact how the electoral college works, and what it does for (to) us.
The EC is the only way states like Wyoming, N & S Dakota, etc have a voice.The electoral college is a relic from the days of slavery, and effectively lets chunks of land (the two senators from each state) to get additional votes above and beyond the selection by the people.
Should we do the same thing to the United Nations, and only allow countries with most population decide for all? Right now, the UN has a sort of an international electoral college, where even the smallest nation has a vote. Should the first most populous countries, China, Indian, US, Indonesia and Pakistan always lead?
Vatican City is the least populated country in the world; 764 people.
Like I have said over and over again, this is not the place for me to say what I dislike about the Democrats.There is no Republican platform. And you never specify what you dislike about the platform of Democrats. Who will tell you exactly what they find problematic with the Republican party. Even lifelong Republicans will tell you why the current state of the party is in trouble. Ones with top secret information. And who are now compelled to the point of supporting Kamala Harris in the upcoming election.
They each have 2 senators and 2 representatives. Nobody's looking to change that.The EC is the only way states like Wyoming, N & S Dakota, etc have a voice.
They are minority states when it comes to population.
Don't youns always go on about how minorities should have a voice and be heard?
I don't want Trump to be President again, and me voting for anyone else doesn't matter anyway because I will be in a minority around here regardless. Never the less, I am fine with my vote, probably for a third party.In any time before 2016 you could present an argument. In 2024 there is no rational argument to support republicans. Their platforms are immoral and have aims that are not plausible unless they change certain laws. So the republicans will likely do whatever they want and fall back on right wing courts, especially the SCOTUS, to cover their acts. For example deporting millions of migrants, including those here legally, will require a suspension of current immigration laws. That didn’t stop Trump in 2019 when they put migrants in facilities that were not sanitary nor safe for those held beyond the 24 hour maximum. They broke domestic and international laws. They didn’t care.
It will be worse. And I will bet that you and many other conservatives will regret wanting him to be president again.
Sure youns are if you are wanting to do away with the EC and their 3 EC votes.They each have 2 senators and 2 representatives. Nobody's looking to change that.
And they'd still get a vote for president, just not one that gets 5 times (IIRC) the weight of someone living in one of the more populous states.
Yes. People died because of that day.Yes. Read more of that article. Four were Trump supporters and a fifth died the next day but a medical exam said that he died of strokes. Of the four who died, one was shot and the other three died of causes not related to the insurrection.
You keep saying you don't want Trump to winI don't want Trump to be President again, and me voting for anyone else doesn't matter anyway because I will be in a minority around here regardless. Never the less, I am fine with my vote, probably for a third party.
Is there any piece of fake news that you don't latch onto?Projecting much?
While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect.
An ABC employee’s sworn affidavit claims ABC cheated to help Kamala win
The Black Insurrectionist did the legwork and obtained what appears to be a duly signed affidavit from an ABC employee attesting under oath to the network’s staggering corruption to ensure that Kamala Harris won her single debate against Donald...www.americanthinker.com
I don't know or care what anyone thinks of my one solitary vote.You keep saying you don't want Trump to win
You keep saying you will vote third party.
In short..
-You see it as not voting for Trump(which is correct)
-They see it as you aren't voting to keep Trump out because you're not voting against him and voting for their party.
Sure youns are if you are wanting to do away with the EC and their 3 EC votes.
How will the ukranian people who've lost their land, liberty, and loves ones react? How will the parents whose children were trafficked, tortured, raped, and murdered by Putin's forces react? Whenever you simp for Putin, remember those kids.This is Harris and all dems when Russia wins the war.