• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I'll go the that thread and always wish to update my knowledge. I googled but I did not find a site that carried the info you provided. Could you help? I am open-minded and looking for answers to my questions.
  2. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    Every "message" has the right to be judged on its own merits, not on the nature of the messenger. If what I did disappoints you so much that you reject the message because of the messenger, then your decision is certainly disappointing. By throwing away the baby with the bathwater, you are...
  3. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I gave false information so that I would be caught. If I had not wanted that I would have completely changed my identity. I have used sandor606 on all other forums and I am very easy to track on the internet. My purpose was, as I explained, to have someone else tie me to The Urantia Book. I...
  4. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    Yes, I am that Sandor and thank you for being the one who brought this all to light.The untruth of my claim to have an undergraduate degree in Biology was meant to get people to question me, dig deeper into my background and, hopefully, have someone discover that I am connected with The Urantia...
  5. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I got my degrees in a village in Africa from a witch doctor. The focus is on the messenger instead of the message because nobody can answer the questions. By consistently focusing on me, assuming everything about me, and calling me names you and others have shown your true nature: judgmental...
  6. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I already ansered the question as to why the constants of physics are the way they are. Read my posts or Google for the answer.
  7. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I want your opinion and the evidence that support it, not a link, so we can dissuss it between us. What about the Cambrian Explosion, the sudden appearance of birds, the feather, the avian lung, to name a few, how did they suddenly appear? They could not have occurred as a result of gradual...
  8. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    Here you go with insults again. You are the ignorant one as you ignore my questions: What produced the Cambrian explosion? Whence do birds come from and from what organs have feathers and the avian lung evolved? Darwin's accumulative minute changes acted upon by natural selection cannot account...
  9. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    If this is the case, what brought about the Cambrian explosion? And whence did birds evolve? Specifically, what organs became the feather and the avian lung respectively thorugh small, successive steps? Please provide suppporting evidence for your claim. You missed the evidence I provided...
  10. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    Get your facts straight: I never said I was a biologist; I said I had an undergraduate degree in biology and a graduate degree in philosophy of science. I consider myself an epistemologist. BIG difference, right? Today, biologists agree that natural selection drives microevolution which...
  11. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I am neither ignorant nor dishonest but you sure have an opinionated and offensive mouth. Early on in this discussion I was asked to provide info on tests/experiments that support ID. If that is the standard then it should be applied to all interpretation of evolution. The E.coli experiment...
  12. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    From your link: "The long-term evolution experiment was intended to provide experimental evidence for several of the central problems of evolutionary biology: how rates of evolution vary over time; the extent to which evolutionary changes are repeatable in separate populations with identical...
  13. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I am an epistemologist, not scientist.
  14. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    You think so little of me that you write my name in small case. No matter. Funny joke, too! You are really funny. ToE is not science either because there is NO way to test - by whatever means- the 600-million long process "in a laboratory," no matter how long the experiment takes place. One...
  15. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    Stop assuming. I read the titles and, imho, not a single one is a longitudinal test or experiment that proves Darwin's theory. However, I will gladly read a quote from any of the articles in which such conclusion is reached and I will read it with an open mind.
  16. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I could overwhelm you with evidence from links on ID but that is no way to proceed in a discussion. In a discussion, I learned in graduate school, (a professor and 10-12 sudents around a table) each participant comes with a description of her/his position, supporting evidence from credible...
  17. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I am saying that to my knowledge there is no testing or experimentation that has provided supporting evidence for Darwinian evolution. Since you are requiring this standard, please provide such evidence that supports your position.
  18. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    Of course it is speculative but so is Darwinism and the hypothesis of self-organization. Until testing and experimentation have been carried out, AP and the other theories will remain speculative. The point is, however, that ID based on SAP is the most likely to be correct given the nature of...
  19. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I will not read from links. OK, The Origin of Species is not a science book, then it must be pop-sci. Whatever the case, while there is no supporting evidence of that kind for ID, to my knowledge there is also no testing and experimentation that supports Darwinian evolution either. Please...
  20. sandor606

    Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

    I don't know anything other than what some scientists are reporting, and neither do you or anyone else unless they made the discoveries themselves. Question 1 was answered. Some scientists claim it was by design; I share that view based on the evidence presented. Question 2: Yes, I do. Yet...
Top