It's not how the Universe came to be that is used as evidence for design but the just-so (and no other) nature and value of every physical, chemical, and biochemical component. For instance, the constants of Nature, the nature of the carbon atom, and the nature of the genetic code are deemed to...
I consider human a being that possesses will, the power of making one's own decisions. Animals have drives and instincts they must follow; only human beings have the power to choose.
When I say scientists I of course mean the proponents and supporters of the theory. Minority or not, ID is worthy of being judged on its merits. I am sure there are scientists who disagree with the anthropic principle and if you know of any by all means present their case. My purpose is to offer...
I don't know what alien intelligent life forms would think of the Anthropic Principle but I do know what proponents from different fields of the natural science think. I share their view.
Scientists are not saying that evolution of complex conscious life was inevitable, on the contrary. They...
I get my ideas from science books. The info has been posted and I don't argue nonesense, just the Anthropic Cosmological Principle and matters related to it.
Anything is possible... perhaps. Whatever the case, it is a fact that without respiration there would be no life as we know it and you and I would not be here discussing the issue.
Of course I have but anaerobic life includes only very simple organisms. Evolution from unicellular to multicellular forms of life could not have taken place without respiration.
Absolutely. I share the view of those scientists who believe that evolution took place not according to Darwinian principles but was instead directed. The original life plasm contained all information necessary to bring about all the genetic changes and modifications. This is one of the key...
Tell that to the scientists who make the claim. And I did study biology :yes: and if you had we could now have an educated conversation about these wonderful discoveries, something that at the present time is obviously not possible.
What is being argued and shown by new science is that all that simply "is" in physics, chemistry, and biochemistry is just so because it has to be that way if carbon-based life is to evolve into homo sapiens. The goal - the evolution of Man - determines the nature of the means.