i did not think that evolution was any kind of a divinity, i thought it was a process and i am unclear what the ultimate goal of the evolution process is, if there is any.
personal interpretation can be applied to anything, but i thought the evolution idea was not something that needed...
what are naturalistic explainations? are those things that can be reasonably explained by most people? or are they things that only nature holds the answers to?
if that is the case, then what caused genes to shuffle around?
if they shuffled around for a purpose, for example, to fill a niche, then what motivated them to do so? if weak genes die off because they cannot survive,then why do genes need to shuffle around?
if evolution has no goal, then why do things try to survive, why is there a need for the survival of the fittest?
if filling niches is a process, then what intellegent thought, or whatever, put that process in motion?
"earths biomass is microbiotic organisms".......is your point that...
yeah, i know my ignorance is a shame, but i get by. i tell you what, i'll just call evolution, evolution , and pretent like you do that its a widely accepted principle by most of the world community, i''l never use the word theory again, and that way your ego will never be challenged again, by...
i stand corrected, i got the wrong name in that reply, so forgive me, and apply the reply to yourself.. and thanks for the advice, i think you might know something about how not to look. i think in the future i'll just use the word idea instead of theory because that seems to really upset you.
thats a good explaination, probably the best ive heard, it seems its simply a survival of the fittest deal, which does make sense at most levels for most people.
theres still the thing about variety thats not clear. why variety in species? whats the point? one may say that a certain...
if those eveolutional molicules had to decide what morals would help them better survive, where did that power to decide come from? it had to come into existance somewhere along the line. intelligent thought just didnt pop into existance...or do you believe it did?
it might be helpful to remember that evolution is just a theory...the theory of evolution, it has never ever been a principle and the theory of evolution is not the same as darwinism.
the idea of the god of the bible creating everything doesnt have a shred of evedence either, its something...
so it would be fair to say that you believe the theory of evelution and what you call cultural reinforcment are respondsible for morality. that still means that somewhere along the line someone or something had to decide what the moral was going to be........and i`m interested in what you...