• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. M

    This thread is not about evolution.

    Yah, I know but is is fun to think about it.
  2. M

    This thread is not about evolution.

    We are actually on the same page here Mestemia. Before Einstein, cosmologists (along with atheists) believed in a static universe without a beginning (infinite). This creates a kind of paradox in a time continuum from past, present, to future. If the past is truly infinite, then it is...
  3. M

    This thread is not about evolution.

    Sorry about my freely using the word causality.
  4. M

    This thread is not about evolution.

    Gunfingers, LuisDantas, Riverwolf, The problem is we have a different definition of causality. Your definition of causality is “determinancy of future events”, i.e., every determinant cause is followed by a resulting effect (in Heisenberg's words). In this case, you are absolutely...
  5. M

    This thread is not about evolution.

    By causality, I mean cause and effect. For every effect there must be a cause. Nature is governed by it, such as fossils are the result of natural explanations. "Super"-nature is not, such as miracles. The miracle just might be supernatural, but it has affected something in nature. If, for...
  6. M

    This thread is not about evolution.

    Hi Autodidact, I like your thoughts, but I see a small problem using the scientific process. The scientific process requires causality, and creationism is not bound by this. Can we manipulate the rules slightly to keep this idea going? Mike
  7. M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    Hi Man of Faith, Have you seen the evidence from peer reviewed literature or from another source? The reason I continue to stress this is because a mandate for research to be published in scholarly journals is that the facts must unavoidably lead to the conclusion. If they do not, the...
  8. M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    Hi Man of Faith, This claim is actually testable. Go to Google Scholar and search all of the scholarly literature on biological evolution, speciation, and common ancestry. If your claim is true that evolution is based solely upon assumption and presupposition, then you will find that...
  9. M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    A friend of mine believes he is pragmatic enough to take a second look at it, even though his background is in Baptist ministry. I agree with Amill, especially when most serious idealist candidates move centrist in order to get reelected. Mike Searching for Truth with a Broken Flashlight
  10. M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    Thanks for the posts everyone. Slowbreath, variation in species is a causal result of common descent, with the most similar species having genetically closer relatedness than less similar species, i.e., a more distant common ancestor. It's kind of like one set of your great-great-great...
  11. M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    Hello, My name is Michael Hawley and although new to this forum, I have been studying the evolution/creation controversy for 35 years. Of all the online forums discussing this issue, I have decided upon this one for numerous reasons. I am quite excited to join in on the discussions...
Top