Boy, how did I know I would be sent to a evolutionists page? Once again, they offer no evidence at all on a kind of species changing to another species.
You knew this was coming...
The Truth About Macroevolution
If anyone could come up with any kind of proof of macro evolution, I would change to the old earth theory. There has never been any evidence of one species (or kind) changing into another species. Why does everyone think micro=macro?
The evidence of the earth being approx 6000 years old matches the flood theory perfectly. Our so called great scientists of the world would look at the aftermath of Mt St Helens and describe the chaos being millions of years old.
I know...pretty cool word huh?
In Christianity, we would say they actually were a different type species (kinda, sorda). At the point of creation, they would have been initially programmed to live forever, with no corruption at all. Sin would have changed this, and degraded the gene pool...
The science of Creation is in complete accordance with the Second Law. Creation science teaches us that Man and God's other creations were all created with informationally dense, uncorrupted DNA. Adam had more genes and more robust genes than you or I have. This is evident in the extreme age...
I would agree that entropy increases as life goes on...but I see this as an example of there being, at one time, a starting point of a purely non entopy environment. In other words, absolutely no chaos or disorder at all. I see that as energy is used, that entropy increases.
I would conclude that all graffiti is painted by humans.
It seems to me that non-creationists are the ones that do not use logic in their explanations of things.
Ok, but are you serious about billions of friends and chances to drop the letters?
For there to be that much time to drop the letters, then energy would have had to of been around for that length of time to drop them.
I believe the 2nd law of Thermodynamics would show that as energy is used it...
But, that is where it gets very shady to me...
the evidence to me shows very distinctly a designer.
Have you heard of the scrabble game example? If you were to come upon a scrabble game that someone had dropped on the floor with letters everywhere...and in the middle of the letters was a...
Not trying to plead with my question. Just assuming.
Going back to my original question though...is it faith to say that life started from non-life at some point?
Do you have evidence that of life ever coming from something non living?
I understand that at some point there had to be an uncaused first cause...right?