Pathetic. The article is not about refutation of the ToE it was about genetics in computational systems biology and was published by the Royal Society.
it's not really specifically about the Arabic nations but rather the "Islamic Golden Age". and no, Greeks didn't establish the basis of modern science but yes, the numbers developed in India, but the Arabs collected, advanced and spread the knowledge of all older civilizations (Greeks, Romans...
You acknowledged the rule of the “Islamic Golden Age" for establishing the basis of modern science and the betterment of humans? Then we’re in agreement. Other than that, your Ad Hominem is meaningless.
Nonsense, I never mentioned anything about finding all of them. You fail to understand the point as usual. Here it is. Read it again. You may get it.
“How they are related to each other and which, if any of them, are human forebears is still debated.” says anthropologist Bernard Wood.
Oldest...
Exactly, this is the point all my sources are pro-evolution, they’re all top scientists and respectful mainstream scientific organizations yet you call them extremists, would you like that I quote the scientists of the “Discovery Institute” such as "Stephen C. Meyer" and many others? I can if...
Did I ever say that? When? You’re only parroting some irrelevant statements that you don’t understand as usual.
Genetic Drift does work, and Mutations do happen. And as I said many times, it’s not about the encoded info in the genes but rather the extremely complex gene expression process that...
Everything.
Specifically Islam was the driving force that established the basis of the modern scientific method. Are you even aware that the numbers that you are using are Arabic numbers? Can you Imagine how would our world today look like without it?
Fibonacci’s work made the Arabic numerals...
Neo-Darwinism/Modern Synthesis (MS) contradicts empirical evidence of latest science; it’s an outdated theory that should be replaced. Currently there is no alternative theory that could provide an agreed upon theoretical paradigm as an acceptable replacement to the disproved MS. i.e., evolution...
Nonsense. Did I ever claim that everything is “1+1=2" and not anything else?
“1+1=2" was not intended literally but only to represent these concepts that can be validated through logic or the type of questions that can be answered logically.
“1+1" itself may yield different answers unless you...
My bias is “God” and I have reasons.
Your bias is “uncertainty” but you contradict yourself by being certain about “uncertainty” itself. It really means nothing other than the fact that you don’t know and cannot know or be confident enough about anything.
We always need a premise before any...
Peer-reviewed articles, publications of the Physiological Society, the Royal Society, ScienceDirect, PubMed Academic Database for the Health and Biomedical Sciences, top scientists such as Corning, Noble, Müller, Shapiro, Steele, Crkvenjakov, Heng, Gorczynski, Lindley, Tokoro and may others are...
The nonsense is your typical disagreements/claims without justification merely because you said so. It has no value to anyone other than yourself.
If you are pro-science, then you should know that the scientific method is all about seeking causes to explain the observations/effects in an...
This thread is not about comparative theology, but every claim must have a reference. You are a Christian. Your reference is the Bible. Jesus (PBUH) taught about hell/eternal place of punishment more than anyone else in the Bible. Here are some examples:
1- “Then he will say to those on his...
True, Consciousness/cognitive capacity with the ability of input processing/decision making is definitional to life. Even the smallest living cells (prokaryotes) are no exception. Yes, life couldn’t exist without it.
The concept of Consciousness and how life of all kinds depends on it is a much...