Wow! A long post with an attempt to be rational and you provided your source for a change!! Amazing, this is not your style! Who wrote this post for you? But regardless of the nice attempt, it’s still pathetic.
So, you acknowledge that the journal is well known peer-reviewed publisher, Peter A...
I did many times. It’s not even an argument. I stated facts and provided the resources. That’s it. You’re in a state of denial that blocks your ability to understand it. And again, genetic variations as in the so-called “microevolution” do not give rise to the alleged “macroevolution” over...
Sure, we can do differently. But when it comes to “1+1”, there is only one logical Answer. We cannot answer differently unless you are irrational and since you already acknowledged that you are irrational, then go ahead and do differently but it will be false from a logical perspective.
We’re...
First, whether creationism provides a model or not, it has nothing to do with the validity or invalidity of the ToE. You’re playing a false dichotomy.
Second, as I explained many times, you are under the illusion that you have a model that explains the observations which is absolutely false...
”We’re never neutral”. When I said “we”, did I claim myself to be the exception? “We” means all of us. I’m no exception but at least I’m aware of it. Got it.
No, it doesn’t and I did explain yet you insist.
Species “adapt” not “evolve”. Adaptation is erroneously called "microevolution" but it's not evolution at all. it's a totally different process and nothing is random about it. see #1245.
Darwin's Illusion | Page 63 | Religious Forums
Adaptation...
The Modern Synthesis/Neo-Darwinism has failed as a scientific theory. Some may accept this fact, some may deny it but regardless, it’s a verifiable fact.
The MS is not a model of evolution. The MS is the only scientific theory of evolution. The theory has failed. But many of those who already...
How can you do any testing without a reference or a premise? Even "testing" is a logical process that requires a reference. Do you understand? Without a premise, there are no conclusions to follow. Without the absolute, there is no relative of any kind to follow. Do you understand?
A holistic view of as many puzzle pieces as possible is crucial for the logical process towards connecting the dots of reality.
Actually, a holistic interdisciplinary diverse field spanning the formal, natural, social, and applied sciences does exist. It’s called “Systems Science" and is...
yes, my thoughts are in my mind, your thoughts are in yours but that has nothing to do with the validity of the thoughts from a logical perspective. I know you don’t acknowledge logic/rationalism, but I do. It’s Ok. We’re all different.
So you’re wrong and your wishful thinking and empty claims are meaningless.
Why should anyone take your empty claims seriously?
It’s the typical nonsense of yours.
First, the scientific article is by Peter A. Corning. He is an American biologist, consultant, and complex systems scientist...
We can't talk about speciation before first identifying what is “species”. As I said before, the definition of species is controversial. There are many methods for identifying species. Ernst Mayr's Biological Species concept based on the ability of interbreeding is neither the only definition...