What is evolution if not the scientific theory of evolution/MS? If the mechanisms are false and the framework is false, the theory is necessarily false. Evolution is a scientific theory not an axiom.
The Modern Synthesis is false as demonstrated and the alleged evidence is an illusion. (Again...
No, Noble still accepts the “axiom" of evolution. He completely disproved the scientific theory of evolution (MS) and all of its central assumption. No exception.
Again, it’s not Noble alone. See # 5258 & # 4087
Darwin's Illusion | Page 263 | Religious Forums
It’s not only Noble, it’s the work of may scientists that disproved the Modern Synthesis. But again the Modern Synthesis is not a model of evolution; it's the scientific theory of evolution. The theory was disproved and it was not replaced with another agreed upon theory. Meaning, currently...
Yes, you may infer that God is absolute as the creator, but we cannot speculate the attributes of God or what God wants from us, that is why God approached humanity with messengers. See #4896
Darwin's Illusion | Page 245 | Religious Forums
Ring species is still a “species” but with distant ends that cannot interbreed. Can a Chihuahua naturally breed with a Great Dane? Yet they are both the same species and will never be anything other than dogs.
I told you that the definition of “species” is controversial and to keep things...
What do you mean “self-reproducing cells”? Do you mean cells that get spontaneously generated from nonliving matter or maybe strands of RNA freely floating in nature with the ability to self-replicate? Both are false.
See # 1850 for the actual status of abiogenesis
(814) Darwin's Illusion |...
Reaching a concept is a logical process,
establishing evidence with or against a hypothesis is a logical process,
falsification is a logical process. Even peer review is a logical process. Any rational process of any kind must adhere to logical principles.
It’s not about the methodology but...
No conclusion can be drawn without logical ground. Logic is the necessary reference at the very top of any rational process. No idea or meaning can stand without a logical ground to support it.
You’re making an empty claim, but I wouldn’t entertain getting sidetracked with an irrelevant...
Affecting consciousness is one thing and giving rise to consciousness is totally different thing.
Consider the example of watching a football game on TV. The TV is the physical link between the event and your consciousness. Anything that affects your TV, affects your ability to watch the game...
The central concept of the ToE is dependent on the assumption of random mutation. The assumption is false and more importantly, the controlled mutation of the adaptation process never leads to the transformation to a new family. IOW never leads to macroevolution.
The “Modern Synthesis” is not a model of evolution. It’s the scientific theory of evolution. Evolution is not an independent axiom. Evolution is a scientific theory (MS), which has already failed. See #4087
Darwin's Illusion | Page 205 | Religious Forums
The notion that evolution is an axiom...
What quote mining? Obviously, you don’t even understand what you are talking about.
In # 5278 I said, “The organism can make changes controlled by the cell machinery". In # 5279 you asked me to post the supporting links, which I did in #5280. Why you argue now about the MS? I guess you’re...