• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    This is what you keep failing to understand. All my sources are from your side of the argument, i.e., evolutionists. "LegionOnomaMoi” is also an evolutionist but he is knowledgeable and ethical. See his post # 2266. Darwin's Illusion | Page 114 | Religious Forums and yes, they all insist that...
  2. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    All relative entities/references must end at “The Absolute” at the very top of the hierarchy. Logically, there is no other way unless you adapt a fallacious circular reasoning or infinite regression. Relative/contingent entities constitute the norm of our entire realm. The Absolute is...
  3. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Yes, we are born with a “conscience” that gives us an “inclination” towards moral conduct, but it doesn’t define it. Before we discuss the need for “definition”, I have to ask what is “conscience” to you? Is it merely interactions of matter governed by natural laws that yield a dictated outcome...
  4. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I personally don’t agree to make such distinction. The roots are the same and the overlap is huge. Science is born from natural philosophy and I think science still has the genes of natural philosophy but with a methodology that is more focused on observation/experimentation, regardless the...
  5. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    The core discussion of this thread was the ToE. If you agree that the topic of the thread came to an end, then next is to have a fresh perspective of life/reality that is free from the illusions of Neo-Darwinism.
  6. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Are you talking on behalf of the God that may or may not exist!! Your wishful thinking is pathetic. You keep making empty claims merely because you said so. Maybe it’s enough for you, but you should know that its meaningless for everyone else.
  7. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Seriously? Go back and read my post # 4364, you may get it.
  8. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I never said that, did I?
  9. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    This what you fail to understand, it's not my post. It’s a post by an EVOLUTIONIST like yourself. Do you understand? but he is Knowledgeable and ethical. Again, See his post # 2266 Darwin's Illusion | Page 114 | Religious Forums
  10. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Keep dreaming, you have challenged no one and I cherry picked nothing. Do you think “LegionOnomaMoi" (an evolutionist) is cherry picking as well? See his post # 2266. Darwin's Illusion | Page 114 | Religious Forums Wake up, the contemporary theory of evolution, i.e., the Modern...
  11. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    See # 2266 Darwin's Illusion | Page 114 | Religious Forums It’s not by me; it’s by another evolutionist but rather informed and ethical.
  12. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    My point is specific/clear. Again, my point is the fact that the contemporary theory of evolution, i.e., the Modern Synthesis/Neo-Darwinism is an outdated theory because latest 21st century scientific finds disproved all of its central assumptions. Currently, there is no agreed upon framework to...
  13. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    In the Cambrian Period all major animal phyla with complexity/sophistication of the biological structures comparable to modern life started appearing in the fossil record. In addition, the major body plans of the Cambrian life exhibited considerable morphological isolation from one another. In...
  14. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Don’t you already know that I’m a Muslim? Why asking about what you do know? Morality becomes relative only when it’s up to every individual to define it, but when the defining criteria are ordained by the Creator for everyone to follow, then it’s not a matter of a relative view/preference. I...
  15. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I neither made nor can make such claim, did I? I only try to stay on the path of righteousness and hope I would be safe, but God is the only judge. On the other hand, in your post # 3926 you claimed to be safe, again, is there anything other than your wishful thinking to back such claim? Why do...
  16. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    This is nothing but “pathetic denial” as previously said by another informed evolutionist "LegionOnomaMoi". If you were confident about your stance, you wouldn’t deny the facts. It’s pathetic. See his post # 2266. Darwin's Illusion | Page 114 | Religious Forums Again, it’s not about Noble but...
  17. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    How would you know that? Is there anything other than your wishful thinking to back this up? At the time you find out, there is no going back.
  18. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    If every individual decides on a base for himself, morality will essentially stay relative. What is the basis to define a morality base? Meaningless empty claims/wishful thinking as usual. Even if this is the case for you (which I know it’s not), can you expect the same to be true for every...
  19. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Wake up! We did talk about the Ediacaran period before. See my post #3287 Again, in the Ediacaran period only macroscopic fossils of soft-bodied organisms were found. There are no ancestors or transitional forms leading to the Cambrian creatures were found in the Ediacaran period.
  20. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Noble's paper in question (#753 & #781) is not the only paper that challenged/disproved all the fundamental assumptions of Neo-Darwinism; many other papers/scientists did the same. We discussed that before on this thread, you seem to forget, I’ll repeat. You’re free to hold tight to obsolete...
Top