No, if the framework is false, if the central assumptions are false (contradict latest scientific finds), then the theory is false.
The problem is that evolution is considered by evolutionists as an axiom independent of the MS theoretical framework. It’s not.
Ok, since we both agreed that you have an egocentrism view, then there is no point in discussing a different perspective with you. You are the defining reference. I’m not.
What can be accepted as true if not through the rational means of philosophy? Philosophy defines rationalism and the inference principles for the scientific method to allow the interpretations of observations and the extraction of conclusions. Otherwise, no conclusions would be possible. Do you...
It does show a beginning of the universe about 13.8 billion years ago. Beyond the BB, there were no matter, physical laws, radiation, space or time. Nothing physical of any kind. It was the beginning.
Big-bang model | Definition, Evidence, Videos, & Facts | Britannica
Big bang theory | McGraw...
Everything in our realm has limits. Everything is relative. Nothing can be defined unless it gets defined in relation to something else/reference but How is that relevant? It’s not about what makes sense to me in a personal sense, I only provided options/possibilities and asked you to provide...
I use these sources for their confirmation about the errors of the outdated "Modern Synthesis" not for their beliefs about evolution or their alleged claim about you being a monkey. It appears that you’re offended by such claim, are you? Don’t you agree with them wholeheartedly? Why would you be...
So you are the sole arbiter and you have no problem for others to conform to your code but you have no reason to defer to somebody else's version, yet you don’t consider it to be an egocentrism view.
What is conscience or the inner voice? Why/how in many cases it acts against the desires of...
Didn’t the empirical means show us that the universe has a beginning not eternal (i.e., contingent being)? Didn’t the empirical means show us that every single entity in our realm is contingent, and our entire realm is a contingent entity with a beginning? Didn’t the empirical means show us that...
This is neither an answer nor an option. I didn’t ask you what is known/unknown or asked you to provide positive correct answer for anything. I only provided options and asked you if you can propose other options per your view and which option would be logical to you. Do you really think that...
I didn’t pose “c” as a fact, did I? It was only an option.
Again, is there any other logical option other than a, b & c? Go ahead and propose more logical options and let me know from your perspective which of the options is logical to you and why.
I’m not doing philosophy, you are.
Here are your options:
a) A is dependent on A1, A1 is dependent on A2 ….(continues in an infinite regression)
b) A is dependent on A1, A1 is dependent on A2 …, Ax is dependent on A (circular reasoning)
c) A is dependent on A1, A1 is dependent on A2 …, Ax is dependent on "the Absolute". "The...
I’m not doing any philosophy, at least not in the sense that you imply, in that sense; you are the one who is doing philosophy.
Are there any alternatives to understand reality other than observing the world and extracting conclusions through rational reasoning? Philosophy is concerned with...
That should be the norm but what is “guilt”? Why would you suffer?
It’s like your “body and its desires” is an entity and your inner being is another entity that may agree, disagree and judge the desires of the materialistic body. Can you see this duality within you? Why/how it exists.
That says it all. You see yourself as the defining reference and see everything in the world in relationship to what you feel, and your personal views or standards. Nothing matters to you but what you feel/desire. It’s a self-centered/ egocentrism view.
Can you understand that other person's...
Really? When I used the word “illusions”, I used the exact word from the scientific articles. But when you used it, it’s nothing but another one of your meaningless empty claims. See below and my post #4087
Darwin's Illusion | Page 205 | Religious Forums
Further illusions: On key...