you are but it appears that you are not aware of it.
do you imply that it's not? do you think every observation is an illusion? it's an interesting view.
I did but obviously you didn’t read the scientific article that I provided. It clearly explains current status of abiogenesis. Here is the link again.
Chemistry of Abiotic Nucleotide Synthesis | Chemical Reviews (acs.org)
Chemistry of Abiotic Nucleotide Synthesis (acs.org)
At what point...
You must have “rational reasons” that led to your adaptation of “skepticism”. Can you see the contradiction? You managed to make a judgment based on logic. Since you used rationalism to prove irrationalism then rationalism stays as the only reference to reach conclusions.
your notion cannot support anything to be true or false and you fail to understand that your own notion as a subjective idea in your mind should not be an exception.
I say your notion is false. we can draw conclusions with acceptable level of certainty through logical analysis of...
No, abiogenesis is axiomatic because it’s considered as true (the only option) independent of any evidence. The notion that one of two must be correct is a false dichotomy. Other options may be possible (such as panspermia).
Only if you consider abiogenesis as an axiom, otherwise the lack of...
in my case, it's never because I said so, I always provide the sources.
in your case, it's always because you said so, yet you are under the illusion that your responses have any merit.
I guess if you have other ideas in your mind, then you exist. do you? I wonder what kind of ideas? do you think its valid, invalid or just some meaningless rhetoric? is there any other option?
please stop the ignorant notion that the MS is a model of evolution. I explained many times that the Modern Synthesis is the only scientific theory of evolution. the theory has failed, period.
you fail to understand that my concern is the scientific theory of evolution. the theory has failed as a scientific theory. it's a verifiable fact. do you understand? I'm not concerned about your axiom. you may keep it.
whatever you say is a subjective idea that can be wrong? you have no way to be certain? if you are not certain about anything and cannot have an acceptable level of certainty about anything? then you have no basis to argue about anything.
in your case, there is no reference. without a...
it's enough that you understand and confident about your view. wait a minute! are you actually confident about something? I was under the impression that you are skeptic about everything! are you? do you take your thinking for granted? shouldn't you be skeptic about your own thinking? if you are...
No, the DNA is nothing more than storage of coded info. Again, it’s not about the info but rather the controlling processes. See #5291
The notion of replication of the fittest genes is misleading/false. All genes get replicated but the unfit is more likely to naturally perish. It’s not...