Identify it.
If a necessary prerequisite is not possible, the process is not possible. The premise is wrong, and the explanation is false. There is no randomness in nature. All evidence points to order/control.
You need "someone" to begin with, if "someone" doesn’t exist, then no one would...
Concerns with the morphological discontinuity/sudden jumps in the fossil record were already identified by Ernst Walter Mayr (Mayr was one of the 20th century’s leading evolutionary biologists who was called “the Darwin of the 20th century”). Then the prominent paleontologists Eldredge and Gould...
In my post #2645, I said, “without causality as a fundamental principle, the entire scientific method collapses”. The scientific method always seeks explanations/causes for observed phenomena. In principle, if causes were not necessary, science itself would be unnecessary. The reasoning logic...
Didn’t we discuss scientific racism, dogmatic control, the Big Bang, religious concepts, logical reasoning, relative perception of reality, consciousness, etc.? a discussion of a thread can very well branch to other related topics. Why is that a problem to you? It happens all the time on this...
True, they imagine that the absolute reality must be limited to their relative understanding/perception of it.
We previously discussed consciousness/intelligence at a microbial level and even at atomic and molecular level (#226)
Darwin's Illusion | Page 12 | Religious Forums
but in fact...
Not true, the point is availability of components/building blocks is never a justification of the emergence of a complex functional structure. Unless the right block is intentionally placed at the right spot every step of the way, no functional structure would ever emerge. If random blocks kept...
You acknowledged that we see design in nature. Design is essentially a functional arrangement of entities for a purpose.
Regardless of any explanation of why the observed design exist, it’s irrelevant to the fact that we do see design in nature. Design/purpose is an evidenced fact. Attempts of...
No, LUCA’s age is assumed to be around 4 billion years ago, but it’s really irrelevant to my point. Everything you mentioned is merely unevidenced meaningless speculation. I’m not interested in arguing about irrelevant details of a fairytale, my concern is the underlying logic/concept.
Again...
You don’t read or understand and just dwell in denial.
Didn’t I specifically mention line of evidence # 2 and # 3 in my post #2637 and #2625 and also provided a summary in #2625 (last item)? You may also see “conclusion of study” and "conclusion" at the end of the article
Near-Death...
If RationalWiki page need improvement, it doesn’t change the fact that Infinite regress is a logical fallacy. Didn’t you see the other link (logicallyfallacious.com)? We shouldn’t argue about the basics.
Homunculus Fallacy (logicallyfallacious.com)
Infinite regress/ homunculus fallacy is a...
Pathetic excuses. The test is neither my claim nor a restatement of my claim.
In your post # 2639, you asked, “What possible test could show your beliefs to be wrong? The test needs to based upon predictions of your model, not claims of your model.”
If everything is caused/designed/created by...
It’s a logical necessity. The cause is evidenced by the effects. The contingent is evidenced by the non-contingent.
Seriously?
Infinite regress - RationalWiki
Homunculus Fallacy (logicallyfallacious.com)
See things!! This is exactly the point, the NDE studies verified that what the NDErs reported was true experiences that are not possible or attainable through any physical means not merely imagination or hallucination. You bias clouds your judgment, read the article.
Near-Death Experiences...
The prediction is that we should see intention/design/purpose in every entity from the entire universe to subatomic particles, which we do whether you admit it or not.
Show me absence of order through valid inference, my belief is false.
if you don't know, it doesn't mean it's a "throw away...