Come now. It's the atheists and their scientists side that has no cosmological argument :D. Otherwise, we would've had it in this thread by now. Moreover, creationists have ontology.
We have Pascal's wager.
You got nothing haha.
You don't get it. No threats are necessary. Just repentance and John 3:16 from the atheists.
REPENT. The end of the world is coming. John 3:16.
Dr. Lawrence Krauss, of ASU, was asked what would make him believe and he said maybe if the stars aligned themselves and said, "I am here." This...
We'll all be laughing, even though we shouldn't when you and the low brow internet atheists get it. It'll be like drinking coffee and then spitting it out due to normal reaction.
Chick.com: No Fear?
Your disbelief is not my problem then. I can't help it if you are not a reasonable, rational, and logical person. I already established you believe in Satan's Antibible which science does not back up. Furthermore, your absolute proof will be provided to you when the "all eyes will see" event...
All I can do is provide the evidence. You have no evidence that it is false. It's based on a being who is all powerful who is timeless, spaceless, beginningless, eternal, as there could have been nothing then, called the void in the Bible. Instead, you believe in universe ex nihilo which is...
God warns us of false prophets. Satan is the one who tempts us with false prophets. God allows false prophets because of free will. In this fallen world, to have true prophets, then we have to have false ones. Thus, you are the one who is misguided and didn't listen to his warning.
Anyway...
The majority of circumstantial evidence or historical/forensic evidence is on the evolutionist side; the only scientific method is with natural selection. The creation side has the scientific method with natural selection and more (too much to list here). Where we have eyewitness testimony is...
Thank you. It's God's word so quite true.
The argument is Kalam Cosmological Argument which is quite powerful. The opposition does not have concrete evidence for big bang which is a theory while Kalam has the CMB. Prior to that, the creation scientists didn't have anything to hang our hats...
What properties does blood have? What can happen to it in our bodies?
If regularly replenishing blood is good through blood donation, then homosexuals who practice, even once, can not do it. This is because their blood may be tainted. The also ask if you traveled to a list of banned...
No, you brought up plants and humans can not create a blade of grass without a living cell. That is evidence for God.
Currently, I'm learning Malachi where there is blood sacrifice from the ancient times. The congregation was supposed to bring their best lambs for slaughter. So what happens...
If p -> q, then ~q -> ~p. Do you agree with this? If not, then good bye haha.
p = universe had a beginning, q = God exists. If universe had a beginning, then God exists. What does this represent?
It also means if no God exists, then universe did not have a beginning.
This is under the General religious debates forum. How does hiding your head in the sand help prevent the effects of Adam's sin? Is there a religion that states something like that?
Sorry, I should've specified larger apes like gorillas. There are no gorilla-chimp hybrids. Moreover, we do not see tailed monkeys become tailless. We're missing the transitional evidence in the monkeys.
Now, you're moving the goal posts. Before, it was a disagreement over when life begins. Now, it has been proven that life begins at conception. It means the fetus has a right to life. Thus, we have Alabama trying to lessen the impact of abortion.
I also presented the study that abortion...
No one has found an unicorn in the wild, so it just exists in our imagination. With animals, it's assumed they do not exist if it hasn't been discovered for a while. This is how we know an animal has gone extinct. So, while we do not know for sure, this is what we assume.
ETA: This is one...
Good day.
Yet, my hypothesis is what causes us to die is old blood assuming we live out our natural life. If we can replace our blood from time to time, then can it be healthy and help us live longer? If we are older, then we have to have our replaced with someone else's by transfusion.
Look...