If we manipulate the rules, would it still be a verifiable and reliable science? To be regarded as a science, it would have to follow scientific procedure. What manipulations were you thinking of?
The same question could be asked of any extinct taxonomic group. However, why does there need to be a purpose to their existence? Every species has / had a function within their habitat, but I think that's different from a purpose, which is a teleological question. I don't see that there was a...
I do what I can in terms of giving to charity, educating people about natural disasters and living a more equitable lifestyle.
And it still hurts to see what goes on in this world.
My point is that in this world (the only one we know of with certainty), we can make a difference, no matter...
Depends how you define a sensory organ. Plants don't have the same sensory organs as animals, but they do have receptors specific to certain molecules and can respond to light. There is nothing supernatural / supernormal about this ability - any botany textbook can tell you this.
Your OP talks...
[/LEFT]
No-one denies plants can communicate. A similar discussion can be found on another thread:
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/living-world/76031-do-plants-feel.html
There are some links to papers that you might find interesting. What is in dispute is that there is a supernatural...
Whether a plant possesses a soul or not is a different matter to the idea of plant perception.
I haven't read the links you posted yet, but I'll have a look. It reminds me of a book published in the 70s called The Secret Life of Plants. Not many people take the book seriously these days.
Thought I'd post this nugget I heard last night and revive this thread. Apparently, what we perceive as flaws in design (the wiring of the vertebrate eye, potentially dangerous vestigial organs such as the appendix and so on) do not detract from the validity of ID. Bad design is still design and...
I, as an atheist, can understand this. Religious belief is something deeply subjective and personal and dependent on experience. But this is the problem. If it is so personal and subjective, how can anyone provide reliable evidence for it to others?
I'm happy to concede that people have such...
For those in the UK (or who can get internet radio), Christopher Hitchens and Tony Blair are debating the role of religion tonight on BBC Radio 4 at 8pm.