Let's put it simply this way. We'll assume, for the sake of argument, that there is a credible mechanism to trigger the Flood, and that the floodwaters now comprise the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, despite all geological evidence to the contrary. Now take the example of the deepsea angler fish...
You don't by any chance mean the same irreducible complexity that Michael Behe, its founder, refused to defend under oath, and which was soundly declared as religiously based ideology by the Supreme Court? Nah, you must mean another one, paragon of truth, virtue and accuracy that you are.
You seriously have no idea how refreshing it is to have a theological discussion with a fellow teenager who isn't a religiously blinded moron ;) Out of interest, were you raised as an atheist, or did you come to the conclusion later on in life?
It is probably a disproof of natural selection and evolution in itself that Nature has allowed people of such astoundingly low mental capability to survive. ;)
For sheer stupidity, check out Ray Comfort trying to prove Creationism by using the 'brilliant design' of the "biodegradable packaging, well curved, colour coded, tab-at-the-top, easily opened" banana. I don't know whether to laugh or cry sometimes :D
Funniest thing I've heard so far is some...
"I am intellectually honest with myself and others." - Jollybear's 'about me' section -
No, you're not. You continually deny clear evidence provided to you and repeat discredit and patiently explained falsehoods. You must be speaking some Creationist dialect of English.
Quoted directly from AiG:
"The 66 books of the Bible are the written Word of God. The Bible is divinely inspired and inerrant throughout. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs. It is the supreme authority in everything it teaches. Its authority is not limited to...