Well ... if the thing that is to proove supposedly claimed that there is evidence and that evidence is not found ... then "yes", wouldnt you say so? ;)
Another variation of the cosmological argument. Now applied to morals.
Of course one could rebut that for hours but a mere question might perhaps give you a hint.
"It proves the existence of the inventor..." according to your logic demands that there was something pre-existing. So what caused...
Hi Dunemaster, sorry for the late reply. I didn't have time before and i think your post deserves some time (seldom enough to find a good discussion in this board)
You stated that i deviated a bit from the topic and i accept that point. Although i think what i said is connected given that you...
If it were about that then the thread had the title "islam forbids eating pork" and the first post would be "because the quran says so".
But as we can see someone here seems to feel a need to give a justification. Thats why he named the thread "WHY is the eating ...." and brings in his first...
I think you see it from the wrong perspective.
They do not deny the religion. They only deny that certain doctrines or texts are either still valid or have been interpreted correctly.
The "art" of telling some followers of a religion they are not true followers is a millenia old art.
You might...
I meant to say that he would be reasonable.
It is the only assumption that would make sense.
Well i think if it is a problem, then it is a major one. As you stated science tells us how things ARE and not as they should be. So IF there is a discrepancy then it does constitute a problem. Generally...
As a side note (an important one though) we need to define once what morals are for you.
Basically all mankind has a similar core set of morals, so i wouldnt confine "morals" as the exact teachings of the bible or the quran or.....
Anyway ... indeed i think morals evolved.
For a great part we...
What do you mean?
You mean reality is independend of our wishes?
Surely it is.
But when we try to understand reality then (i would presume) we do need a reasonable assumption on which to base the start of our search, wherever it may later lead.
And frankly i think God is reasonable.
If we were...
Well, shouldnt you rather think about the folowing question:
"If one desires so much to change to heterosexuality althout it is such a complicated biological process, wouldnt it be better to assist him in changing his desire to change?"
Of course.
What amazes me however in that statement is the following (i have the same issue with for example young earth creationists speaking about "it is written in the bible..."):
I would say that God (if we assume that he exists) would reveal himself using a method that does not require...
This indeed is a strange person.
On the one hand one must acknowledge his views on science. He is not the stupid stubborn creationist that normally runs around here.
On the other hand he perhaps is more to be pitied for he actually made nearly all the right steps and stops ignoring them all...
I wonder how you think this to be true.
You might have made the experience that you think you are more moral or a better person after conversion. Thats fine.
I however have more than enough examples of the exact opposite.
PS: Don't forget the apes ;)
What do you mean by "arbitrary"?
You mean we could just as well have developed the morals of rapists and killers?
As i said this is not really plausible for such morals would not likely yield a society as result.
Of course it does.
The chances of survival are of course greater if a species can form groups and unite for common causes.
Your ideas about God are a postulation and do not actually explain anything.
DarkSun, you are (as an example) ignoring all that I have said already.
First of all you make the mistake of speaking about "some" God while in truth this already is the first strange assumption. Christians are NOT talking about "any abstract possible being that one could call God". Christians...
Morals are a normal part of evolution.
Just think about it for a second.
If we as species had not developed moral behaviour, then we would have already been extinct.
Do you really think a species where rape, pillaging and stealing is considered "good" would survive the day?
Obviously not.
Which...