Theories , hypothesis and suggestions !
You are attempting the desperate use of a red herring - Trying to lead one away from the fact that you said scholars determine history !
Sheesh your own super duper bias is overshadowing his!
Man oh man since when do scholars determine history?
Are they the ones who pre-ordain everything ? :D ROFL :p
If they determine history then their illusion in their own beliefs in fairy tales and fictions stem from their imagination...
Aah yes. They did go back in time and many of those Professors with their bloated egos were unable to face the truth so they became delusional and fabricated their own histories. They are now like catatonics withdrawn in their delusional world, able to hear and see things, but forever...
That's nice so only your histronics, sorry history, with your massive bias to prove your opinions and views is applicable. I prefer to get it from the horses mouth and not outsiders drawing their own conclusions through conjecture and guess work. :eek: :glomp:
:hugehug:
There surely were some misunderstandings in the beginning. Actually there was no knocking of Hinduism; If you remember Vicky you would have seen from the conversations with her that the quest was to learn about Hinduism.
He apologizes for those initial "misshaps" and assures you that he did...
My dear Aupmanyay I remember you well from conversations on the about.com, Hinduism Forum where you twisted everything that Daniel had to say about the bible not being his bible and other things and your insistence that you were an Advainta Atheist. His years of studying yoga, meditation...
Just try reading the bible with an open mind regarding such "chariots" They are found under different texts where the observers try to explain what they saw using words common to their time.
What about the UFO's seen in our modern times. That is those for which no logical explanations could be...
He can believe whatever he wishes but a belief only remains a belief and as he can only guess and use conjecture without concrete proof what he believes is not a proven fact. (yet for him it could be a case of - as you believe so it will be unto you. i.e to him it becomes a fact)
When a man was commissioned to investigate the history of and the areas surrounding Austin, Texas, he could not find anything factual older than two-hundred years.
Here you come and say we know with certainty about things that may or may not have happened thousands of years/millenia ago...
muhammad_isa, I fully agree with you.
The question is why should we believe outsiders, and not the Jewish people who know their history better than anyone else.
In this regard please see the following link. They even say when Moses was born and who his parents were ...
There you confirm that, from my interpretation of what you say, you think that he may be a looney . Anyone can for that matter, especially when they are fanatics or have a super duper ego or an over the wall self-esteem, be a looney.
He does give the patent number so it is there for...
Dear me try reading what he actually said. The fact of the matter is you cannot face facts even when as per your foregoing paragraph. you twist it to say that is what Dever said ! No it say according to consensus The link to Dever refers to other possibilities.
Cheers for now - the time...
See what I mean when I say something and you warp it to something else to suit your own thoughts !
They did not have a word for an aircraft so naturally they would use an existing word to try to get their thoughts across.
That is old news. The fact remains that the embedded link says something else; Which should have been a clear indication that I read it all.
The so called embedded link says, "according to William Dever", yet according to William Dever as per the quoted ink he said something else. So I...