• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. B

    How Many of the 10 Commandments has the POTUS Broken?

    All of them, just like everyone in here. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
  2. B

    Is the need of salvation an evil lie from religions?

    Well if there truly is no need for salvation why would we inherently feel guilt? Even sometimes when people tell us not to feel guilty and we know logically that we shouldn't? Furthermore, if Religion caused this guilt why do atheists and those who don't believe still feel it? If one believes...
  3. B

    There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

    Because in reference to something in our natural world it has never been observed and cannot be shown, by A definition God is physically unobservable and transcends our world, which is exactly my point. In one aspect you're speaking on the laws of nature in the other you're speaking on...
  4. B

    There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

    So saying that it would take something that transcended creation, something eternal, to create us (the definition of a God to be exact) is illogical? You'd have to provide me with some of your logic aside from gun+foot=shoot to convince me of that. Comparatively the new theories on the...
  5. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Or because they were Christian concepts... But this is a side argument I don't wish to put time into
  6. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    The new testament never allowed any of those actions. And which texts were removed early? Also how do you know it was fraudulent? Jesus to this day is the most influential person to ever walk the planet, and is talked about 2000 years after his death, heck we even count our years by his death...
  7. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Right because now you're reverting to your, I'm assuming atheism? I apologize if that's an incorrect assumption. But that's exactly what is assumed by there being a God. It's logically unsound for you to flip flop between two premises. And to your first point perfect love doesn't always mean...
  8. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Sure, I don't mean to infer they don't change at all, but the major principles have remained the same for thousands of years. Also we are able to compare it to early translations even now. And I highly debate that they're secular when it's quoted "endowed by their creator with certain...
  9. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Your reason is the very definition of God, omnipotent, all knowing, meaning he knows more than you
  10. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    He never claimed to be all merciful, instead he claimed to be a perfect judge He did, it's called heaven so I'll ask again if you think that world is perfect, would it be evil if a baby, who suffered at most 3 years, died then went to a perfect place for eternity? And again if he is ALL...
  11. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    But America for example, has done this and it's the reason why we can even begin to debate our "rights", because they're not opinions they're unchanging standards Not necessarily, being that a religious text doesn't change, you can immediately prove fraud by inconsistent actions.
  12. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    If you'll surmise with me that heaven exists and God knows that even when a baby dies a horrible death he spends eternity in heaven, is it really an evil thing? OK so if you're assuming he's all powerful shouldn't you gather from that that he is smarter than you and he is doing what's best for...
  13. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Right and if people are basing moral ideas off of scientific fraud it's impossible to determine until someone proves that fraud. Sure, and that's why it's a terrible idea to base morals on science.
  14. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Well if God is the perfect judge and he judges that to be a good reason in both cases then you'll be fine, I don't believe I or anyone else can tell you the punishment on it and the Bible doesn't say we can either. We can provide axioms and be discerning to what I see to warn but we're not the...
  15. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Unfortunately this is probably the biggest untruth I've ever seen, most studies that get funded are done purely on political grounds, one of the most biased areas. On top of this scientific fraud is extremely prevalent and results are most always skewed to one viewpoint or another. I believe...
  16. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Well I surely don't know what governments would think of a God sacrifice to atone for a crime and maybe that's the point, same with vicarious redemption. I also think that even you should understand that if you were to assume God existed committing a crime against him would surely deserve...
  17. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    Unfortunately science is not a process that determines things for itself based on evidence and reason, it is full of human bias and human interpretation. Whereas the Bible yes can be interpreted but it can also be disputed if it is not followed, that's the problem with "science" is that there is...
  18. B

    The argument that God provides a basis for objective moral values is bad

    I apologize in that I'm not familiar with his assertions that there is moral growth but there are countless defenses for why the Bible, specifically the new testament, is true over other religions, I can get into them of you'd like. And they're saying that the morality that most closely...
  19. B

    There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

    True, but it can never be certain until it is observed, it's only possible, therefore you're still taking by faith that it is certain.
  20. B

    There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

    God is prime mover, the uncaused first cause, that's the definition of a God, the alternative is an infinite regress, therefore a God is more plausible.
Top