"I think it is pretty plausible that we are related."
That is just an assumption. If a process of abiogenesis or front loaded evolution did happen it could have produced an organism that has a DNA that will only evolve into an organism with ape like characteristics and other organisms with...
"False, since all dog, wolf, fox and the jackal species of the same genus Canis can still interbreed."
No it is not false. In order to be considered a new species and not just a hybrid the inability to cross breed is the main factor.
Your statement only verifies what I said that even with...
Replace evolution?
We know natural selection occurs but no solid evidence it results in speciation.
I thought I mad it clear that through a process of abiogenesis or front loaded evolution that species may have the ability to mate and pass on characteristics but are prevented by DNA from...
Where is your evidence that humans and apes have a common ancestor?
Where is your evidence that modern humans and neanderthals can and did breed?
You seem to be accepting the speculations of some scientists as fact.
First you need to read and understand your own links before responding:
"Ring species also present an interesting case of the species problem for those seeking to divide the living world into discrete species. All that distinguishes a ring species from two separate species is the existence of...
Yes or if you isolate scientists and feed them only one theory and tell them they must eat that theory or lose their funding you will breed narrow minded evolutionists!
If isolation is not the answer then maybe the answer is that speciation from one species to another does not happen.
It is possible all species are only capable of natural selection for characteristics but not to produce a new species.
"Each after their own kind"
This could happen if a...
If isolation is not the answer then maybe the answer is that speciation from one species to another does not happen.
It is possible all species are only capable of natural selection for characteristics but not to produce a new species.
"Each after their own kind"
This could happen if a...
spe·ci·a·tion: the formation of new and distinct species in the course of evolution.
Generally speciation is only said to occur when species from the same genus have evolved to the point they can no longer interbreed.
The mechanism thought to create the conditions for speciation to occur is...
If you have not read part 1 of this discussion it is here:
http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/can-a-genesis-god-be-explained-from-a-science-perspective-part-1.186233/
In part one of this discussion I examined the "God" as described in Genesis KJV as creating the heavens and earth. That...
"The tactics used cannot be divorced from the person ... so I win! See?"
What I see is you are still under the immature impression that a discussion is about winning.
"Man clearly created the laws"
You are confusing the term "law" and our interpretation of that phenomenon with the phenomenon itself.
I could show the mathematical formula for a law which is how we test a law but that is just how our human intelligence is trying to grasp a phenomenon and...
"laws of science are by their nature works in progress."
I would not agree with that. Our understanding of those laws will change and have changed over our history due to our limited intelligence and technology.
The laws seem immutable.
No that is just a lame excuse to not accept the definition provided and to try and distract from the topic.
If you want to debate that go start your own discussion on that interpretation please.
"when comparing the definition you have provided, with the OP you write, is that intelligent design isn't talking about the evolution of existing life via cross-breeding or genetic manipulation, but rather the creation of life"
No here is my OP:
"We can now clone animals with no natural...
Now go read that article. They did not create life. They claim they observed a chemical reaction.
Yes chemical reactions occur in inorganic elements. Not evidence of life which is more than a single chemical reaction.
You should also be aware the New Scientist is a pay to publish magazine...
There is no quote mining and just another example of your lack of reading comprehension.
I made it clear that I was using the KJV narration of Genesis.
That therefore would eliminate the second part of that definition.
God- (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and...