"Biblical conception of God as an entity with conscious intentions"
As I stated I am not addressing the entire bible or any religions interpretation of Genesis.
"The Laws are separate from the Universe and do not have shape or form and the Laws simply exist and is an entity separate from the...
"The laws are artifacts of the Big Bang (expansion?"
Your evidence for that that theory is what?
"and could be different in different Universes"
Evidence for different Universes?
"unfortunately, laws are properties of matter-energy"
This is a contradiction. Energy and matter are directed by the laws and would not exist without the laws.
How does energy and matter come into existence without laws in your theory?
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to promote any religion and I have no religious beliefs. It is only a thought experiment to understand the biblical book of Genesis from a science perspective and maybe find common ground for science and creationists to discuss. Since the story of creation in...
So you actually think because you have been on a forum longer that means you are somehow more educated or developed in your theories?
Now that is hubris lol!
"highly disingenuous."
No it is very genuine and that is just your opinion.
You can call it genetic engineering if that makes you feel better but still fits the same definition.
See those sheep in my avatar?
They are genetically engineered by some Intelligent Designers in a lab.
" Given the preponderance of ancient life forms that have been found as fossils that are clearly transitional between the major classes of animals and plants today."
No- there is not a preponderance of evidence and they can only be assumed to be transitional forms and not from one species to...
"The general theory of evolution is not debated by serious scientist."
Here we go again lol!
It is not seriously debated because scientists get their grant funds from government and other sources that want no debate on that theory because it would open a door for creationists.
Much easier to...
No I am not wrong. Peers just accepting without going through the rigors we require to validate a theory is not comparable.
You simply moved the goal posts and declared a touchdown lol!
"an experiment done decades ago"
Yes and the fact that it took place in a lab under created conditions means anything that came out was intelligently designed not evolved.
I lean towards organic life somehow got to earth to start the process either accidentally or intentionally.
Good point!
You could however take some DNA from that dog and clone it to make a copy.
Would that be the same dog with the same personality but not the same memories?
My position is not rigid so explaining it would be ALL OF THE ABOVE.
I look at all mechanisms for life on earth and evaluate them based on how they could happen.
All of them answer a portion of the problem and none of them answer everything so it is probably a combination and still mechanisms...
So you went to Oxford?
You claim it is not drummed into you but you sure have a hard time exploring or letting anyone else explore any other theories or mechanisms that do not fit your own agenda. To the point you and your buddies tried to trash my entire discussion which you now seem to have...
" the answers are much more complex"
Well it took along while but finally you are saying something reasonable.
Yes it is very very complex and we are greatly limited by our technology and our own barely evolved intelligence so we should not accept any theory including Evolution as the only...
Then why after all the times you have been shown ID does not require a Deity do you still refer to it as having one?
Sounds like you just can't accept that fact!
Another example of how Sapiens can not accept reality and must find some way to justify his agenda.
Dawkin's statement is right there for all to read and clearly says Intelligent Design is a possibility and those sheep in my avatar are all proof we do it all the time through genetic...
If the first life was intelligently designed it could be front loaded to evolve only in certain ways which explains why we don't find many links in the fossil records.
It could mean evolution is not random mutations but a designed process and that throws all evolution theories except front...