• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. dimmesdale

    Science standards under threat in Arizona

    Tell you what dude, i may decide to respond to some of your posts if you donate a hundred bucks to this site. Have a nice day. o_O
  2. dimmesdale

    Science standards under threat in Arizona

    Public education is fine in my area. It may have extra challenges in other areas where private education is funded with public monies without having to adhere to title 9 requirements. All the gravy and none of the grief. This is a dodge to an explicit question for the third time. If the...
  3. dimmesdale

    Science standards under threat in Arizona

    Why is it amazing? It is not a level playing field since the best can expel or refuse admission. For example, we do not do special needs students here. They are for profit and all things being equal they do not perform better. Most will not deal with our students if they don't have to. Esp when...
  4. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    Who is ducking here? Where is all the mountains of conclusive evidence for the ape/human common ancestor?
  5. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    Real creatures is the issue here. An extinct ape/human unknown mystery creature is the description (because you don't know what it was) of the alleged ape/human common ancestor. It just sounds like an all hat and no cattle claim and the reason i point this out is to show double standards. Going...
  6. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    Something does otherwise it is everything from nothing including life. That simply will no do. Atheists have a problem with God. They keep dragging God up. They have no problem with ape/human common ancestors mystery creatures. Betcha you believe in the mystery creature and all the boatloads of...
  7. dimmesdale

    DNA - Blueprint for Life?

    That is not what I asked. No. We attribute the source for complex specified codes in DNA to intelligence as opposed to your blind faith alternative. This is what you wrote. By your standards, please demonstrate the human/ape common ancestor mystery creature existed with empirical evidence...
  8. dimmesdale

    DNA - Blueprint for Life?

    Do you apply the same standards to the ape/human common ancestor? You do believe in the mystery creature? Or is it double standards here?
  9. dimmesdale

    DNA - Blueprint for Life?

    They are integrating information technology in biology these days. Hello! Like heck it isn't. The evidence is in the digital codes which are building instructions. Just keep moving the goalposts to avoid the obvious.
  10. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    Where is the evidence for everything, including life from nothing? While you are at it perhaps you can provide all that mountains of evidence for the ape/human common ancestor mystery creature.
  11. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    Garbage. That is ginned up. Pulled out of your backside have nothing to do with investigation. This is all nonsense. It can be deduced logically. If ever nothing then always nothing. If something then always something. If something living then always something living. Then you are saying...
  12. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    in a systematic investigation they do not need a clear idea of the person to eliminate other possibilities. That comes later. Let's say there is dead body shot thru the head and a spent gun shell located on the floor 10 ft away from the dead body. From that, we can reconstruct from the present...
  13. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    It is not a problem. More an excuse. An infinite Being would not be reasonably compared to a cat. Right, there you are at your conclusion but is it true or fiction? And if they were all on the same page, then critics would say conspiracy. These are all repeated over and over. Reasonably...
  14. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    There are no uncaused effects at the macro level. If your bank account goes down to a negative 200 then it cannot be reasonably chalked up to an uncaused effect. There was a cause or causes. It would be irrational to assert an uncaused event and no need to look for a thing not there. The...
  15. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    You don't know that for a fact. Besides, you have no macro level validation for uncaused effects. Blind faith. That is why your atheism does not resonate. It explains nothing and is nothing dependent. It would rationally be uncaused since they rule out infinite regression. Besides we do not...
  16. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    There is no basis in the present to assume an uncaused effect. Not really. So that leaves out any cause. There is something extrinsic of our universe or we would not be here. Naturally, time would be involved in some manner. So yeah time was prior to the universe. Otherwise, it stops all...
  17. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    Objective relative to us? The start of the universe would rationally need a trigger. That trigger would be objective relative to us and it would rationally be a mind all things considered and as opposed to its alternatives. The question presupposes an unbias mind on the other end when that is...
  18. dimmesdale

    Atheists are not nearly as rationional as some think.

    A person would have to read them, study to get the jist of their position. Ken Ham...''Millions of Christians around the world hold this view, as did Jesus, the apostles, and virtually all orthodox Christians prior to the 1800s.'' So why were they all wrong, including Jesus and the moderns...
  19. dimmesdale

    Science standards under threat in Arizona

    You did ask what good is the Bible since it can be used to both justify and argue against slavery and I simply applied your reasoning (ecco-logic) to a hammer. Would you like another? How bout a car? A car can be used for getting from point A to point B. A car can also be used to run people over...
  20. dimmesdale

    Science standards under threat in Arizona

    Critiques are off topic since nobody comes on here for these reasons. They are rude and uncalled for. They are not arguments. Keep it on the subject. It adds context. Strike two.
Top