• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    We can compare and observe available genetics all that we like, as rigorously and as strictly disciplined as we would like. Evolution theory is laced with anecdotal evidence, hypothesis that cannot be observed and tested, or replicated. In a strict scientific sense, much of it would be...
  2. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Interesting topic, @Sayak and I were talking about things of this nature earlier. Would be nice to get back to this. Yes, TE’s are in abundance in all organisms’ genomes. ‘If’ is a weak word. I do not disagree that a lot genetic material is passed down hereditarily. However, this conflicts...
  3. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Off topic, but when people put an overemphasis on labeling others they attempt to divert from anything useful. Said user kept putting an emphasis on religion, creationism, god, the Bible, Christianity and invoking them into all of their responses to me, and attempting to label me when I never...
  4. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Hope that you find what you’re looking for! Good humor in that :).
  5. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    It took you about 5 of your own posts and I still don’t even know if you understand your quoting of my words and adding your own words in post #162. (Still no acknowledgment from you, is there still confusion?) Ignore you go. Clearly, I have doubts that you’d be able to see accurately and...
  6. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Let’s. Correct, that is direct evidence which is the strongest evidence. ‘Through inference we draw conclusions.’ This is the best you’ve done so far giving an accurate description. In the examples(plural) that you gave, you failed to mention the false equivalence brought up here...
  7. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Are you surprised? I’ve already quoted all of posts clearly presenting your quote mine, trying to divert away. I’ve also already posted your diversion. I am not going to keep repeating something useless and fruitless. Caught with your hands in the cookie jar for anyone who can read to see. :)...
  8. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Fair enough, I don’t require anyone agree or conform to have a conversation. I do disagree that the quality of the work is consistent :)~. There are many well-intended scientists trying to improve science. Glad you’re one of them. I think that many don’t go on because of the politics, job...
  9. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Oh well, try to keep avoiding. Another fruitless conversation. Shame on me for engaging and being an inhibitor for your deceptive, quote mining, and dodging abilities.
  10. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    ‘Initial chimpanzee, false equivalence.’ There was no need to quote mine only half of a sentence to make it appear I was referring to an initial, individual chimpanzee. You know very well that I was referring to your initial statement of false equivalence.
  11. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

  12. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    You failed to bring up your initial chimpanzee, false equivalence. You’re grasping at straws rather than just admitting you may be mistaken. There is nothing wrong with being mistaken or erring. I for one would not think any less of you.
  13. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    To infer is to deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning RATHER THAN from explicit statements. Inferences are educated guesses. Explicit: stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt. Inferences are not explicit. Evidence are not proofs. A...
  14. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    The same methods of knowing about reality aren’t used. There is no set in stone scientific method. Some domains are much more difficult to come by, the quality of evidence isn’t as great, an inability to test and experiment an abundance such as in astronomy and evolution. Many predictive models...
  15. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    No judge makes a best guess or best assumption when it comes this. There is no ‘some degree of probability.’
  16. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    If the predictions, hypothesis, inferences are not accessible by observation or experience, the hypothesis is not yet testable or experimental and so will remain to that extent unscientific in a strict sense. One does not need to infer(best logical assumption or best logical guess) that one is...
  17. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    No, and I think that you made a false equivalence.
  18. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    There really is no set in stone scientific method. Hypothesis lead to predictions. If the predictions are not accessible by observation or experience, the hypothesis is not yet testable and so will remain to that extent unscientific in a strict sense. I have no objections to any inferences...
  19. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    If you’ve ever seen a case in court where a chimp or numerous chimps have been subpoenaed for a paternity test for a human female’s child, I would definitely love to read about this equivalence.
  20. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Current best explanations of inferrence are fine. Everyone has their inferred best explanation. If certain inferences are accepted by the majority, that is fine. I am impartial to other/alternative inferences, predictions, and hypotheses. Not everyone must accept and conform to one. What is best...
Top