• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    I am highly skeptical of anyone proactive for both vaccines and eugenetics. One being Jonas Salk. SV40-Cancer-Polio Vaccine Link Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine. - PubMed - NCBI
  2. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Which potential fossils are you referring to? When we reduce to initial causes you, I, or anyone else does not know based upon material evidence. What people decide for themselves is irrelevant. Unfortunately, most people do not even decide or think for themselves as is. I don’t care what...
  3. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    First, I hope you decide to modify your post as you’ve quoted what I’ve said, and added your own words to it. “Did you read that, so why did you offer it?” That line was never said by me. Yes, it’s already been clearly demonstrated by emotional hostility from a few that are now ignored who...
  4. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Easy ignore as well. Disagreement is great, but all you had to do was provide the substance and definitions I asked for, no other finger pointing salads, and judgmental salads were ever needed. Keep talking the way you do to others and you’ll have nobody left to respond to you.
  5. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    You’re an easy ignore. You’ve single-handedly managed to distort and alter so many words, on top of quote mining in a few short posts it’s not even worth the effort.
  6. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Informative, thank you. You spent some time and good effort, diligently writing about how new genes and variation may arise within the same specie listed in the follow up example. I do have some questions and responses to a few things. I also agree that new genes can arise in the same species...
  7. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Have you evolved into what is referred to as the golden rule?
  8. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Flooded with responses. Must have missed it. Will go back and read.
  9. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    The answer is rather simple. You do not know if Charles did or didn’t. You place faith in the testimonies of humans who present Charles as not to have done that, have a natural tendency to lie, destroy, act, deceive, manipulate. I know that if I were in a state of bias, I’d defend Charles and...
  10. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    That is a rather dense definition of a creationist. Evolution theory could have occurred mostly how believed to have and it does nothing to disprove or prove natural creators. Many creationists believe evolution theory as is. Science wouldn’t be science if nobody were a skeptic or questioned...
  11. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Rather than avoid... present an example or define evidence and an example or definition of non-evidence, according to Subduction Zone. I don’t have the entire community at my disposal, so you will have to speak on behalf of evidence and non-evidence for your community. I know that...
  12. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    What is a creationist, according to Subduction Zone?
  13. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    When you quote mine one camp and exclude the other camp, who actually wrote the article you’re being dishonest.
  14. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    That is the point, going beyond Darwin’s ideas. I stated that many think the SET needs re-thought. Did you even read what was initially stated? What’s up with adding creation into it, dispute of evolution? Seems completely irrelevant. Why did you do this?
  15. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    You seem reasonable. You also seem to have sound judgement and self-control on whom you wish to communicate with and who not to communicate with, based on how irrelevant and useless bickering can get between humans. The main areas of interest appear to be variation within species or if species...
  16. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? I understand the internal conflicts with evolution theory. I also understand it is easy for many to sit back, avoid, dismiss, downplay, and hide in comfort rather than address. There is no point if anyone doesn’t critique or question.
  17. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Let’s try one more time: What is and what is not evidence, according to Subduction Zone? Do you wish to keep avoiding or answer and help me learn since you’ve already made the initial false accusation that I do not know? Once you remove the false accusations from yourself, you will clearly be...
  18. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Many humans are doing the reciprocal of what they are predicted and should be doing. How can I or anyone be fit to explain something that we don’t naturally abide by?
  19. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Do you demand that your opinions and judgements be true or do have substance we can actually discuss in an honest and intellectual manner?
  20. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    What is evidence and what is not evidence according to Subduction Zone?
Top