• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques.
  2. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Logical guesses and assumptions. I don’t guess and assume all day, everyday. Logical guesses and assumptions. Logical guesses and assumptions are viewed as enough evidence for many whereas logical guesses and assumptions are not evidence. I’ve already made it clear numerous times that there is...
  3. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Irrelevant. I never asked for his teachings or saving grace. I am uninterested in their character, proselytizing, and demands. Nice guilt trip attempt though. These are debating forums. I’m sorry I do not bow down and conform. 2 simple sentences. One stating that truth is attained in many...
  4. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Whatever you say, Darkstorn. Atoms and subatomic particles do not create or evolve then. Biological life, made of atoms and subatomic particles do not create or evolve either then.
  5. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    A simple question asking you if you believe that scientism is the only way to attain truth and all of this. Back on ignore you go, permanently.
  6. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Holy moly you are splendid at deception and diversion. I do not require your saving grace, but thanks. You’ve managed to apply the scientific method in many unwarranted situations. That is why I asked you if you think scientism is the only way to attain truth. A simple yes or no would have...
  7. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Are you inferring that the only truth possibly attainable is through scientism? Like I said, everybody knows that evolution is true. I try not to invoke anthropomorphism into a theory. It is human beings who tell. No, we do not know that cows and whales have an ancestor for certain. It is...
  8. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    There are many pathways that lead to truth, and many don’t involve scientism. Objective and subjective are both part of the natural world. Example: Evolution is true. One infers that cows and whales are related. One infers that cows and whales did not come from one another. One infers that...
  9. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Whatever you say.
  10. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Illustrations are inference and anecdotal. If we go by illustrations, sure we can conclude based on inference only that human skulls are similar to chimp skulls, that human eyes are similar to the octopus, and that the human heart is similar to the pig. Where do you come up with this from what...
  11. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Per what I actually said in post #124: Now here is your post #162: Set Free said: ↑ Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Did you read that? If so, why did you offer it? I understand the internal conflicts with evolution theory. I also understand it is easy for many to sit back, avoid...
  12. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    ‘What’s difficult is to have complex multicellularity, where you have tissues or organ systems.’ Eukaryotic Cell vs Prokaryotic Cell - Difference and Comparison | Diffen The differences are abundant. That is no simple morph. While there have been experiments, they are no true morph. Not...
  13. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    You just cannot resist a useless judgement of agenda. Back on ignore. May be promising. There have been other studies as well but no unicellular has crossed the threshold to multicellularity where cells divide labor between them. Does this address unicellular morphing into multicellular...
  14. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Your zealousy for this stuff is neat, and that is good to see in scientists. Not the emotional, egotistical junk. A hypothesis of my own kind of throws ‘mutations’ under the bus as not being as essential as thought to be. What is commonly referred to as ‘mutations’ is deceptive in my opinion...
  15. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Per Wikipedia, Anecdotal evidence, however, does not qualify as scientific evidence, because its nature prevents it from being investigated by the scientific method. There has never been an observed morph from unicellular to multicellular organisms in present times. There has never been an...
  16. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    And it doesn’t even take someone of religion or science to understand this.
  17. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Do you use it to determine some truths and fail to acknowledge its limitations in many other areas? I have no trouble coming to grips that most of history cannot be tested and repeated. Most is anecdotal evidence and inference. I have no troubles coming to grips with anyone giving their...
  18. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Thanks for the feedback. I will respond in more detail later on when time presents itself.
  19. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    I have much to respond to this, will do so later on. Enjoy your day.
  20. Set Free

    If Darwin or the FBI had less than 15% of the data for a case

    Already did. Re-read #162 of yours. I responded with what I actually stated. Somehow it says that “Set Free” said something never stated inserted by you only. “Did you read that, so why did you offer it?” It’s not a big deal, we are only human. I would appreciate the correction though.
Top