Agreed.
I wouldn't call that evil. I would just call it a problem
Disagree. Intolerance is what is evil.
Huh? Disagree. Very much so.
Wouldn't call that evil either. Instead, also a problem.
Huh?
Agreed.
Meh. It's certainly not nice. Wouldn't classify it as "evil" though.
Not...
The dodge is noted. And telling.
You just shot yourself in the foot here and have shown to us all that you argue in bad faith.
The same way we know when we find the fossilized remains of a homo sapiens, a dog, or any other species.
Morphology, comparative anatomy, osteometry, etc.
It doesn't matter what they call it.
It would be the violation / suspension of natural law.
That is pretty much the same as magic.
Myeah, I don't really care what the catholic church says / declares / thinks.
I don't "believe" in evolution. I accept it as the best supported explanation of...
Why do you always insist on putting words in people's mouths?
No. I would say that more accurate results will do a better job at reflecting objective reality then subjective senses.
And the more accurate the tool, the more accurate the measurement.
:shrug:
How do you propose to determine...
And every time I've seen you say that, as if it is an argument against evolution, I pointed out the idiocy of that mistake and have been doing that for over 3 years now.
Yet, here we are.... with you stubbornly insisting on being wrong about it. As if repeating it enough times will make it a...
Tell us all what lineage that sharks, eels and tuna are on that weren't fish and then were fish, while the common ancestor was considered a fish.
We have been explaining to you ad nauseum how that's not the case at all.
They aren't monophyletic groups. That doesn't mean that they are...
How silly. No. The word "grouping" simply notes that it concerns a group of species. And what that group is, is defined immediately afterwards: last common ancestor and some but not all of its descendant lineages.
Look at the graph again:
In the case of "fish", the yellow lineage isn't...
You mean, aside for literal evidence of homo sapiens of that age?
False.
However, when the evidence of reality doesn't agree with your beliefs, it's not reality that is incorrect.