DNA
DNA
Very very false
These are not mere "claims". These are genetic facts.
DNA has this cool property that it is inherited by off spring. This is how we can determine how closely related you and another random individual are.
It's how we know 2 people are siblings or first cousins or...
Which is a strange thing to say, since every time you post on the topic, you demonstrate that you actually don't have a clue what "statements claimed by scientists" are or even mean.
Ow look, another "so what" argument.
Pointing out the differences between humans and monkey's has no relevancy at all to the genetic fact that both share common ancestors millions of years ago.
The special pleading is noted.
According to an ancient book of myths authored by scientifically ignorant people who believed the stars could fall from the sky.
I'll also point out that at this time, it is completely unknown what happened.
It might also just as well be an accident from an anchor or drag net.
Sabotage is another option, but nothing is known at this moment.
Euh.... nordstream harmed Russia, as they were making billions from it and used it as an asset for blackmailing europe.
It didn't actually harm the EU, as the decision was already made to move away from Russian gas and by that time, deliveries of gas through the pipeline were already halted...
It seems to me that the authorization has more to do with it being an answer to the escalation on the side of Russians to add North Korean troops to the front lines. An answer was going to come. Such could not be left without answer.
Go out, look up. See that giant ball of nuclear fire in the sky? It's called the sun. It feeds the earth with workable energy 24/7. The person you copy-pasted that nonsense from seems to be unaware of the existence of that giant ball of nuclear fire.
Absolutely.
The basics of the theory of evolution actually aren't complicated at all.
Once you zoom in on the molecular underpinnings of it all, the genetics etc, yes, obviously that gets complicated.
The basic principles however (mutate, survive, reproduce repeat), really aren't.
It's true to the extent that the facts of reality support it, like any other scientific theory.
And evolution theory just so happens to be extraordinarily well supported.
I accept evolution theory as the best supported explanation of the facts, because it is the best supported. I couldn't...
1. it isn't, off course
2. and dogma on the level of christian mythology is bad, right? it's a reason good enough by itself to reject it as being unquestionable dishonesty, right? :shrug:
I always find it hilarious to see creationists claim about evolution that it is religion-like, as if it...
The differences between a chimp and an australopethicus aren't larger then between an australopethicus and a homo sapiens. :shrug:
But just for fun: list the differences between chimps and homo sapiens that you think are so significant.
We have over 400 fossils of this species.