Look up what "in kind" means.
I am justifying them because hamas has publicly and explicitly stated their desire to eliminate Israel and Jews from the face of the earth. They are a lying band of rabid dogs with no consideration for their own people.
You can pretend to be "horrified" by my...
Glad to see one of you acknowledge that hamas kills civilians. Until hamas changes their position on destroying Israel, Israel is quite justified in responding in kind to hamas.
I agree but justified given that hamas wants the complete annihilation of Israel and Jews.
And then innocents killed by Hamas have no similar affect on Jews?
I am not sympathetic to a band of rabid genocidal maniacs who are complaining they are the victims of genocide.
Sure it is because there are enough bad players in the ME who could back hamas and Hamas has no compunction about killing Israeli civilians. How many dead civilians should Israel be expected to accept?
So you can't show where I said if suggested "wantonly" killing. Figured. Don't you feel...
Palestinian support for Hamas has increased. Seems they are all on the same page. If you were in charge how many civilian deaths would you accept before you tried a different tactic other than killing your enemies civilians?
Yes it is the choice as hamas seeks the destruction of Israel. They may not but they certainly possess the ability to kill innocent Israelis. And arent very bright attacking a superior enemy.
Where did I say or infer "wantonly". Do you people do this crap on purpose. Go back and see if you can...
Maybe they should complain to hamas and tell hamas to stop killing israeli citizens because every time you idiots kill Israeli civilians the jews kill us. But they won't do that because their goal isn't peace its the destruction of israel.
Maybe they are supposed be better if it the choice is between destruction or stoop i hope they pick stopping over destruction.
What should Israel's response be? A strongly worded letter?