My thoughts are that the argument that the hearsay about Haitian people eating cats in Springfield, Ohio was debunked because it wasn't evidence reflects the weaponization of the U.S. Department of Justice against Trump. The rules of evidence belong to the judiciary, but facts (including those...
Projecting much?
While Kamala did not receive the exact question the moderators asked, she allegedly received sample questions so she’d know generally what to expect.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/09/an_abc_employee_s_sworn_affidavit_claims_abc_cheated_to_help_kamala_win.html
At least 40 migrants have died after a boat they were traveling in caught fire off the northern coast of Haiti, a UN agency said Friday, with police saying the explosion was sparked by a voodoo ritual gone wrong.
https://archive.is/ywnp9
For more context on problems with using animals in...
The corruption of a corrupt system isn't a viable idea in any kind of argument. Cheney's democracy is essentially two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
The presumption of innocence applies, so people are not presumed to be liars.
In your example I would deny that I ate a dog, but AFAIK the Haitians in the story did not deny that they ate the cat.
The facts for your example would be that there was some hearsay that I ate a dog and that I denied...
So what? Facts belong to the public, they are not subject to the rules of evidence.
Stop pretending that I misrepresented your #168.
Here it is again:
and what I literally wrote was:
But please continue to misrepresent what I said, since you don't have any facts that work for you.