• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. stevecanuck

    Even one disbeliever on the earth is too much.

    No. Not even close. Words and deeds ascribed to the mythical character named Jesus urge peace and tolerance (and please don't waste our time with "I bring not peace, but a sword". He never actually used a sword nor did he encourage anyone to do so. In fact, when he was being arrested he stopped...
  2. stevecanuck

    It is impossible Mohammad (s) and his family (a) historically existed and they did not perform miracles.

    Example please.
  3. stevecanuck

    It is impossible Mohammad (s) and his family (a) historically existed and they did not perform miracles.

    Absurd. It IS a miracle for anyone who believes the Qur'an and accepts the details given in hadiths.
  4. stevecanuck

    It is impossible Mohammad (s) and his family (a) historically existed and they did not perform miracles.

    What you're showing here is that 'miracles' only 'occur' when they have to be accepted on faith rather than by observation. Just consider the entire basis of Islam, and that the only person spared from having to accept it on faith was Mohamed. He had 6,236 real-world visitations from Gabriel to...
  5. stevecanuck

    It is impossible Mohammad (s) and his family (a) historically existed and they did not perform miracles.

    Good point that 17:1 doesn't say which servant was taken on the midnight ride. It could easily have been Moses given that he is mentioned in the next verse. And not only is no further detail given, but the currently believed location of 'al masjid al aqsa' is entirely dependent on hadiths. It...
  6. stevecanuck

    Even one disbeliever on the earth is too much.

    Yes it will. Verse 9:29 proves your claim to be untrue - "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until...
  7. stevecanuck

    Even one disbeliever on the earth is too much.

    But, looting the possessions of conquered peoples per surah 8 (and others) is perfectly fine.
  8. stevecanuck

    Even one disbeliever on the earth is too much.

    I asked him that a long time ago, and he ignored the question. However, If you read verse 9:111, you will see that his god tells him exactly what to do. The question is - will he? And will the nearly 2 billion others. They look to me like they're getting closer all the time. 9:111 - "God has...
  9. stevecanuck

    Even one disbeliever on the earth is too much.

    Btw, you contradict yourself here. First you say " If he expressed more liberal views, he may endanger himself", and then you say to ask him what he means. Would he "endanger himself" by answering honestly, or would he not? Pick a lane.
  10. stevecanuck

    Fasad and the death penalty.

    No, you haven't shown it - you've justified it. Islam calls for people to be killed for the 'crime' of espousing non-Islamic ideas. Pure and simple. Oh, and evil. Don't forget that it's evil.
  11. stevecanuck

    Fasad and the death penalty.

    I was typing the above post when I saw that you answered with this. The fact that people should be killed in accordance with Islamic fiat for unIslamic thought makes your religion even worse.
  12. stevecanuck

    Fasad and the death penalty.

    @Link On second thought, it doesn't really matter if corruption occurs in mind or deed, because it still means that people should be killed for unIslamic activity OR thought.
  13. stevecanuck

    Fasad and the death penalty.

    I believe you're wrong about that. I looked at every verse that contained 'fasad' as the root, and not once could I find an example in which it referred only to being corrupt in thought. They were all given in the context of actions. Please prove me wrong, and please be specific.
  14. stevecanuck

    Next time I'm at the Happy Wombat I'll buy you a pint.

    Next time I'm at the Happy Wombat I'll buy you a pint.
  15. stevecanuck

    Fasad and the death penalty.

    I didn't say there was anything wrong with Allah commanding people not to do things that are against his wishes. It's what the religion demands. I'm simply pointing out that your god says that those who don't obey him should be killed. That describes a religion of terror and tyranny. In other...
  16. stevecanuck

    Fasad and the death penalty.

    Because he needed them to augment his army. They are given dozens of warnings because Mohamed didn't want to give up on them as potential arrow fodder. It was actually funny to read all those warnings. It was like the parent who always says "I really mean it this time". Aw, c'mon. That was so...
  17. stevecanuck

    You Can't Argue Against God

    Neither am I. I never said there was.
  18. stevecanuck

    You Can't Argue Against God

    Could you please be more specific?
  19. stevecanuck

    You Can't Argue Against God

    Not really. One who says something exists bears the burden of proof. Rejection of any claim, including the existence of god(s), need only rest on lack of proof of said claim. In other words, Saying, "Prove there's not a god" is not the equivalent of saying "Prove there is a god".
  20. stevecanuck

    You Can't Argue Against God

    Because since you don't know God, you can't justify any argument against for something you don't know. For example you can say there is no evidence of God. How can you say that if you don't know what God is? How can you claim something is not evidence of God? IOW, how can you mount an argument...
Top