The best way, IMHO to understand this is to realize that the early church leaders were trying to find a way to bludgeon pagans into becoming Christians. They took their cue from the Greeks who used to threaten their citizens with eternal punishment in Hades if they didn't obey the civil laws and...
God, where to start???????
How about this corker:
"It was the followers of Jesus who claimed that Jesus was risen."
Which historian will corroborate this?
That's because no other holy book is saturated with blood and mass genocides like the Old Testament. You should be calling it an "unholy" book. An alternative "Inerrant Word of a Mass-Killer God" is also not too bad.
Sure, no problem. ;) as long as you understand the basic gist of my OP: Jesus never said the words ascribed to him in the gospels. They were made up by the gospel writers. They had to be. No way around that historically. :)
You're off a little bit. No problem. You said epistles written 50-56 CE. I said the generally accepted year of Jesus crucifixion is 30 CE. 50 - 30 = 20. 56 - 30 = 26. Span according to YOUR dating of the epistles = 20-26 years. With me so far? ;)
There's nothing rational about that except in a Christian's mind. You're actually saying an anonymous writer sat down and took notes while the HS dictated to him every single word Jesus spoke????????
I don't say definitively Paul didn't exist. Maybe he did. All I'm saying is I and others don't believe he was real simply because someone stirring up as much trouble as Paul would have caught the eye of someone--ANYONE who would have made a record of some sort mentioning him. Acts is anonymous...
I'm sorry. I don't know what this has to do with the topic.
let me re-ask the question: the gospel writers (they were NOT Matthew Mark Luke and John, they were written anonymously) had no sources upon which to draw to get Jesus' words that we know of when they were writing the gospels some...
You haven't got any evidence. Your only evidence is that 12 men who we are not even sure were real--at least there is no historical evidence for any of them-- CLAIM they saw Jesus. That's it. And they didn't leave any written testimony behind. It's a rumor, hearsay, stories handed down from...
Because historians generally use him as a reference point and I have to go with the majority even though I cannot find any definitive historic references to him.