• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Thermos aquaticus

    Aegyptopithecus

    I am an atheist, and I will never claim that evolution disproves the existence of God. Also, there are tons of theists and Christians specifically who accept the theory of evolution. Evolution is a fact, and it is also a theory. Gould did a good job of explaining this. In the American...
  2. Thermos aquaticus

    Atheism people have a belief "God does not exist "

    I believe that is called a hypothesis, which is part of the scientific method. They predicted that if dark matter is real that they would see 4 areas of mass after a galactic collision. Two of those areas of mass would be the luminous matter and they would be closer to the point of impact...
  3. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    By objectively free, do you mean "make stuff up"?
  4. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    And now we are back to your demands that everyone forget history. In a few more posts you will be asking for people to remember history.
  5. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    They don't bottleneck anything. They either pass through the empty space or they collide with the material in front of them. The slits are empty space so they don't interact with the photons. Only the material around the slits absorbs photons as well as the photosensitive screen on the other...
  6. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    So says the person who can't do Jr. High level math.
  7. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    It is useless to ask for a distance in a situation where distance doesn't exist. Why is that so hard to understand? If I told you that photons have no mass, would you keep asking how much 10,000 photons weigh?
  8. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    False. There is nothing 30 million light years away from the photon. There is no distance. Period. Distance only exists for frames of reference below the speed of light. Even then, a distance will be different for observers travelling at different speeds as you were already shown. There...
  9. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    False. The screen on the other side of the slits is the observer. That is what collapses the wave function of the photon.
  10. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    Show us where the observer is in the experiment. It isn't at the slits, I can tell you that much.
  11. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    If the observer effect was at the slit then you would just see one circular area of diffraction instead of an interference pattern. The reason that you see an interference pattern is because there is no observer effect at the slits.
  12. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    There is nothing 30 million light years away for the photon. I have to repeatedly tell you that there is no distance for the photon.
  13. Thermos aquaticus

    An Unscientific Theory On Religion Forums

    There is nothing in atheism that requires other people to not believe. You need to brush up on your Chinese history. Genghis Kahn killed off millions of people, and he wasn't an atheist.
  14. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    We will need more than your say so.
  15. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    For the photon, there is no distance. That's what we keep telling you. Polymath did a great job of explaining this in a previous post. Here it is again: 1. The Earth: the star is 4 ly away, so light takes 4 years to travel. Time dilation factor is 1 (no shift). The galaxy is 10 million light...
  16. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    There is plenty of experimental verification of the photon particle, one of which I already gave you.
  17. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    You ask that very thing when you claim that the speed of light can not be used to determine the age of the universe within the Earth's frame of reference. If you are asking about the photon's point of view, then there wouldn't be any point that is 30 million light years away because there is...
  18. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    Can you try to deal with reality where a photon is a particle?
  19. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    For an observer that is not travelling at the speed of light they will observe the photon moving at a set speed. For the photon, there is no distance so it is meaningless to ask how long it takes to travel no distance. You would observe them arriving at different times.
  20. Thermos aquaticus

    Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

    Try looking up the definition of a photon. It says it is a particle. It is even observed to act as a particle in experiments, one of which won Einstein his only Nobel Prize: Photoelectric effect - Wikipedia
Top