It all went towards her, because she is number one in her head.
Have you listened to her speeches or responses to being criticized?
She values her self and her ideals more than ration discussion, or just being right in general.
Other people are her tools to achieve her goals, and then to be...
The sad thing is that she is a real feminist, just the type that gives most a bad name.
Egotistical and greedy as she may be, she is a feminist.
There are radicals in most groups, namely religions.
The 'good' ones work around them yet still get the heat because of them.
Funny how humans work...
I just watched this video earlier!
You are quite right, she also has a long time hate-hate relationship with TJ (The Amazing Atheist) and the DPP.
They have been covering her idiotic and dishonest antics for years now, she has quite the bad record.
Yeah, give the definition then give evidence.
You are claiming that this is the core foundation of science, you obviously came to that conclusion somehow.
I would assume it to be after logical deduction and evidence, thus I would like to see the evidence as I've already seen your deduction...
Science.
Philosophy.
Faith.
What other definitions do you want?
I don't really need to respond to you past this to validate my arguments.
You can deny definitions if you like, but we should find some we agree on to further the arguments substance.
It's too tiresome to respond to huge posts...
Because it would somehow imply that a person is more overall intelligent simply by practicing spirituality.
Along with spirituality being a fluid and non-objective subject.
I'm exactly the opposite.
Spirituality is unsupported nonsense until proven otherwise.
Never saw that added to science, I assume you made this up or came to this conclusion on your own.
Science doesn't claim that, that is a claim for philosophy.
Scientists might, however. Practitioners aren't...
It would be smart to find who you are and what morals you agree with, then compare those to the sides of the political spectrum.
Most people come out liberal or moderate when they do so, or so I've been lead to believe.
Well the masses of people in the world aren't really super excited by objective knowledge, truths discovered, and philosophical skepticism.
They're happier with things that are simpler to understand, like "God exists so have faith".
They don't care to outright question it, which is funny because...
No, they are not at all equal and should not be held to anywhere near the same standard.
Science is the pursuit of knowledge, that is the practice and the reliability of it.
Nothing within the realm of science has to be taken of faith, it can be objectively demonstrated.
If you think it does...
That argument is based on the logic of a person not being born with the ability to hold a belief in god(s) right out of the womb.
It's an argument that should only be valid strictly in philosophy, in a general debate it's a mute point.
I don't know why there's so much focus on it, there are...
All four are human made, but your argument is interesting.
Science and math are both products of the truth section, and, depending on your definition, science comes first.
Philosophy and religion are products of the speculation section, though philosophy certainly came first.
I don't really have the mental ability to look after plants...
My dear partner, however, is quite crazy about orchids.
She'll likely be growing them all over the yard.