No, I'm being very clear. You stated that you believe underage children should not receive medical care such a meds or surgery. That's unambiguous. Unless you can explain why you would make an exception for one of any number of countless obvious examples of where medical intervention is...
You don't believe young kids should receive treatment, and shouldn't be given meds, surgery or hormones.
You're advocating against the right for doctors to be able to treat children at all. If you believe children shouldn't be able to consent to, say, hormone blockers or medication to treat...
Actually, it was about Vivek Ramaswamy, a right-wing commentator with no medical expertise stating falsehoods and misunderstanding what gender dysphoria is.
Is there a reason why, whenever you are asked for any scientific evidence of your claims, you never cite anything other than anti-trans websites?
You could try, I dunno, a science website?
Is there a reason that you are claiming that a man who illegally obtained and doctored health records of dozens of children and then lied about it to get stupid right-wingers to fund his legal costs is a hero?
You have literally no idea what you're talking about, but please keep lionising...
I don't believe I made any argument that beauty and gender have similar societal impact, I just addressed the fact that beauty is also both socially constructed and personal.
Because women, too, have been historically marginalised by traditional and imposed constructions of gender.
Then your view is wrong. Perhaps you could try talking to them and asking them, rather than making assumptions as an outsider?
Nobody is "lumping them together". They are treated as...
It can be both. There is always a degree to which we individually develop our own personal opinions and understandings of things like "beauty", but there are also ways in which society can influence what is broadly considered "beautiful", and that this influence can have a huge impact on...
And why do you think that women (including straight women) have historically lent more support to LGBTQ+ movements in history?
My point is that you're asking why all these things are categorised together while deliberately ignoring the commonality between them when it's pretty obvious when you...
Have you tried thinking about what those groups all have in common? Like, belonging to a category that goes explicitly against traditional views of gender roles?
No?
Maybe try that.
"If you do X, Y will happen."
"I don't care, I am going to do X anyway."
(Does X, Y happens)
"This is all your fault!"
It's a typical mentality of people who will never admit that they made an error. Unfortunately, a lot of these incredibly insecure and simultaneously deluded people also happen...
Translation:
"Cope cope cope, I am coping so hard right now, cope cope cope, please somebody reassure me that my very stupid decision was actually smart, cope cope cope."