Incorrect.
Because there is no way to tell if that is really knowledge about a deity or not.
There is still no evidence for a deities existence or lack thereof.
“Do not marry idolatresses (al mushrikāt) till they believe; and certainly a believing maid is better than an idolatress even though she would please you; and do not marry idolaters (al Mushrikīn) till they believe (hata yūminū), and certainly a believing slave is better than an idolater, even...
I was just refuting that science changed the word's meaning for an agenda.
I wasn't asserting that using the word theory to mean something else in casual language is not okay.
I was referring to Christianity as a whole.
Rhetoric and avoidance.
Im ending the conversation right here.
You say you have evidence but will not show it.
That either means you are a liar or you do not want it to be debunked.
Newsflash: Not everyone thinks so and we do not have to give it special privileges, deal with it.
Also harassing comments towards other users is not allowed, i gave you a warning and you ignored it.
Now going back to the original topic. If all you are going to do is to tell me to read a book...