• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. David M

    What can evolution really do?

    Bats such as Onychincteris finneryi you mean, which is so like a bat of today that it needed to be placed in a new taxonomic family? The bat without echolocation? No, scientists accept evolution because it can be tested and verified. Suspicion by whom? What are these multiple things...
  2. David M

    Evolution Vs. Creationism

    To have any relevance to evolution it has to be all about inheritance, that means DNA and mtDNA.
  3. David M

    Evolution Vs. Creationism

    No one, and they didn't do it when this bacteria evolved. The bacteria evolved naturally and normally in a way that enabled them to take advantage of new food sources in their environment. Differences in diet while growing can do this, so what? But where is your evidence that a) steroids...
  4. David M

    What does the fossil record say?

    The sad fact is that "if you were not so stupid" you would know that no one claimed Tiktaalik was the first tetrapod and no one ever claimed it was the only tetrapod and no one ever claimed it was the tetrapod that later tetrapods were descended. What was claimed is that Tiktaalik was an...
  5. David M

    Another Creationist Teacher Bites The Dust

    That is because in science a scientific theory is a good as anything can ever get. Thats because there is no evidence that contradicts the core concepts of the diversity of current species arising via descent with modification. Yes, questioned by evidence. e.g. There was observed evidence...
  6. David M

    Are Bears Mammals?

    Kangaroo is quite tasty, that i can confirm.
  7. David M

    Creationist - what is your understanding of TOE?

    And "misrepresent".
  8. David M

    What does the fossil record say?

    Yes, you have provided heaps of evidence for evolution (while saying "No its not"). You have provided zero evidence for creationism. What you don't seem able to comprehend is that minor alterations to the pattern of the history of the evolution of species is no challenge to the explanation of...
  9. David M

    Creationist - what is your understanding of TOE?

    You quoted innacurately, the accurate statements would be as below: One meaning of theory is an imaginative contemplation of reality. or Theory can mean an imaginative contemplation of reality.
  10. David M

    Are Bears Mammals?

    If the ounce and pound are being used as terms of weight (and use the same system, i.e. not switching between avoirdupois, troy, tower and apothecary) and all weighed on the same scales and at the same place then they all weigh the same. If you are switching measurement systems (e.g. Gold is...
  11. David M

    Creationist - what is your understanding of TOE?

    Webster's actual definition. 1: the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another 2: abstract thought : speculation 3: the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art <music theory> 4a : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the...
  12. David M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    No they don't, your source is lying to you. Apes have nasal bones they just do not have the projection that human nasal bones do.
  13. David M

    Mike Huckabee & Evolution

    Yes, just not modern humans. No, because they are not in the genus Homo.
  14. David M

    Mis-translated Bible terms infavor of meat eating?

    Pretty irrelevant mistranslations when the important ones such as in Leviticus 11 are not in the list. From Young's Literal Transalation. That's a direct instruction that animals can be eaten.
  15. David M

    Creationists arguing lack of extraterrestrial life supports anti-evolution position.

    You are misrepresenting the facts again, people have been listening for intelligent life. And we've been listening for such signals for what, 50 years? Thats a minute sample of the possible signals that could be out there.
  16. David M

    Evidence of early man found in Israel

    I read the article, the only quote that leads to any hype that Zimmer has is out of context in the source article. "It's very exciting to come to this conclusion," said archaeologist Avi Gopher, whose team examined the teeth with X-rays and CT scans and dated them according to the layers of...
  17. David M

    Evolution Vs. Creationism

    By this I see that you have realised that your error lay in the words "or how they evolve", because that is exactly what evolution is about. If animals were really living do you think they would be feeding on trees and animals (see how silly that definition is). It looks like you have never...
  18. David M

    imagine...

    I'd guess it would be the lack of evidence outside the self-contradictory bible.
  19. David M

    Evolution Vs. Creationism

    Highlighted is the relevant statement that Outhouse quoted. And its still wrong.
  20. David M

    Genome sequencing leaves Creationists unable to respond

    Its not "man like", its "Man". We have been around for 200k years as a species. Human generations are 25 years, so that is 8000 generations that we humans have been around. Yes, thats not really enough time for us to have evolved into a new species. Its 200K years for Homo Sapiens (possibly a...
Top