what?
Let me get this straight...you will only believe evidence based on peer review and non christian references?
You have heard of Piltown man right? The orangutan/neanderthal lie that went on in secular circles for 5 decades!
My point is, i do not claim no error on either side. What i do...
ok, then take it like this...think back to your school days and imagine your classroom teachers response to questions such as that. As i recall being a student in school and given i was also a school teacher, your question is nothing more than a stupid timewasting disctraction coming from a...
subduction, I am really sorry that you lost your faith and have gone down this pathway. However, there are a lot of PHD qualified individuals in the Creation camp who research and write extensively about this topic.
Id suggesat that you are claiming none of those PHD qualified individuals are...
all this argument about abiogenesis is a complete waste of time...you are arguing about something that has never even been observed...
Many proposals have been made for different stages of the process, but the transition from non-life to life has never been observed experimentally. Abiogenesis...
that just goes to show how poorly you read scripture. You quote 3rd hand wives tails and dont actually investigate biblical theology properly...
Read Genesis 2
5Now no shrub of the field had yet appeared on the earth, nor had any plant of the field sprouted; for the LORD God had not yet sent...
i am a very deep theological thinker...however, i am not following the theology on this. You need to explain it a little more and use some biblical cross referencing to support your theology so i can follow it.
"The influence of atmospheric composition on the climates of present‐day and early Earth has been studied extensively, but the role of ocean composition has received less attention. We use the ROCKE‐3D ocean‐atmosphere general circulation model to investigate the response of Earth's present‐day...
Sorry but I'm not following this theology. Christs cloak of righteous envelops us sinners and we appear righteous. It does not mean we are without sin.
Better to keep this one simple I think.
The research study reference I provided is not a YEC reference...its a secular one!
You need to actually read its conclusions instead of running off on an irrelevant tangent.
Note the URL The Effect of Ocean Salinity on Climate and Its Implications for Earth's Habitability...
This is a most unusual theology...God prevents someone from believing?
The saints of Revelation 14.12 are those with 2 qualities
1. Keep the commandments
2. Have the faith of Jesus
That's it.
It also doesn't prove the earth is old either and that is the point. All that has to be shown is that the 4,54 billion year old age is grossly over stated and the entire old age theory collapses.
So you believe that the salinity of our oceans ISN'T increasing?
You have heard of climate change right and that one of the factors involved in climate change is an increase in both land and ocean salinity levels at a rate faster than the earths natural processes balance it out?
We find that...
You need to read Hebrews 4 again...you didnt read it otherwise you wouldnt have made the above comment. From Hebrews it is very clear that the Sabbath rest is for the benefit of mankind. God also says that we must enter into that rest and He goes further...its also tied to salvation.
Hebrews 4...
according to your world view that is the case, however, it is not the case according to my world view.
BTW, the evidence is an interpretation and is not necessarily fuly supportive of your view.
For example.:
1. the vast majority of fossils for ancestors of humans and apes are cast copies and...
sorry but you have completely forgotten that the Sabbath commandment is an extension of Genesis Ch 2...funny how this gets fogotten...Note the concordance cross references for Genesis Ch 2:1 are Exodus 16 and Hebrews 4!
'
The following tie the Sabbath commandment to salvation (enterring into...
im going to put this in really simple terms...as its too complicated for one individual here:
1. Secular cosmonogy says "the earth was once a waterworld"
2. The water has not gone anywhere
3. The current land elevation, which covers only 29% of the globe, was produced by techtonic plate...
You can harp on with this crap all you like, you are wrong, your comprehension of the entire issue is fundamentally bull****.
I will post the references again...for goodness sake use some intelligence and go away and actually read them.
Again, the origins of the earth are almost identical...
I did not say 70 metre of additional water from ice melt is going to solve any problem. The entire problem you attempt to raise is a construct of your own doing...not mine!
New research suggests ancient Earth was a water world, with little to no land in sight. And that could have major...
That is the problem here...you keep reverting back to the uniformatarist view of steady state. Then after doing this, its back on that same applecart again.
I will say it again,
Mt Everest wasnt 8km high prior to its uplift and your arguing over time is not an argument in support of your...