If what you say is true, then there are many passages in scripture that are hard to explain.
Take, for example, the interaction of Moses with God at Mount Sinai.
Exodus 33:22,23 says, 'And it shall come to pass , while my glory passeth by, that l will put thee in a clift of a rock, and will...
I'm not so sure it is clear and straight forward.
God is Spirit. Spirit is without form, unless a form is created, in which case formlessness (the incorporeal nature of God) is withdrawn. God (the Father) cannot be uncreated and created.
Or, have l got this wrong?!
The 'express image of his...
The Israelites journeyed from Egypt through northern Sinai seeking to cross over to Midian, to the land of Moses' father-in-law, Jethro. This is where Moses had set off from when called by God to free the Hebrew slaves.
The evidence in support of Midian being in Arabia is strong, because place...
Documentary evidence refers to any evidence using written sources, and the Bible is most definitely documentary evidence, even if sceptical modern scholars have chosen to question the authorship of certain books. This questioning of the authorship comes thousands of years after the events, and...
It's very clear to me that you have dismissed the Exodus.
Here are your words:
For someone to dismiss the documentary evidence of the Bible, recorded by the very people to which the history relates, indicates that you must have a better idea of lsrael's history.
Maybe you would like to...
That's no longer true. Evidence of Mount Sinai existing in Arabia is now widely accepted, and even large numbers of slaves escaping from the Paraoh's rule is not going to be a matter of pride for the record keepers of Egypt.
Well, l disagree with your conclusions.
But let's try to get to the detail. I want to know why you dismiss the Exodus from Egypt, since this single event is so much a part of the story of the Jews. Let's not forget that every Passover, Jews sit together, read the Haggadah and remember their...
Good to see you back, Tony.
Moses was allowed to see God's 'back parts' [Exodus 33:23] but not his face. Yet, we are also told that the LORD 'spake unto Moses face to face'. [Exodus 33:11]
How would you explain this?
You have missed the point.
The Bible cannot be dismissed as a myth if it contains a history of a people who still exist today. The history of this people is documented in the Bible with great care, and archaeology has not disproved the Biblical account. In fact, archaeology is the friend of...
This is exactly my point.
From what the Bible says, it becomes apparent that God has bound heaven and earth together. The spiritual and the earthly are woven together in the history of his people. Those who have tried to create a history of Israel without the prophetic element have failed to...
Yes, but it wasn't the first time that Christ had appeared to men.
If we are to say that Christ is the face of God, are we to say that no image identifies the face. When the Lord appeared to Abraham at Mamre, he may have had a different look to the appearance of Jesus. And when the Lord appears...
I'll take that as a 'Yes'.
If the Church is the 'body of Christ', then to be in the body one must 'know' Jesus spiritually. We should not have to wait for resurrection to see his glory, for Jesus said, 'l am the resurrection, and the life'. Do we not enter into his resurrection by faith?
To my...
You say, 'The scientific method is a problem solving method that allows us to accumulate knowledge'. Well, at last, I can agree with you on something. This means that science is not deductive, because it 'accumulates knowledge' by problem solving.
Does it always solve the problems? Clearly...