They are not all the same. That's the point. Everyone expects a primary challenger to support the eventual winner. That's typical politics, and it makes sense. They try to win, but in the end the party is more important.
Calling someone Hitler when you're not even in politics is a wholly...
Right, by supplying yourself with extra info. As I just showed, the answers to your questions are available, but they all depend on more specific info.
The questions you asked were very broad and don't have simple answers. I'm not surprised she didn't answer. I'm not sure what your point is...
Just to be clear, your argument is that if he didn't admit to it, it's not true? That we can't look at his actions and make obvious determinations? Trump claims he didn't have sex with a porn star too. I guess that didn't happen, huh?
Correct. She fought him in the primary, as all politicians...
This has already been gone over multiple times. Here are some of his comments before going into politics:
"I'm a Never Trump guy. I never liked him."
"My God, what an idiot."
"Trump is a cynical ******* like Nixon...or that he's America's Hitler."
"Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation's highest...
Sorry, I already pointed out specifically why you'd need to provide more information to get any kind of real answers. For example:
"Wait times in countries with universal healthcare" gets you:
Links after that all give answer similar and pointing out the different kinds of care that have...
Yes, he wanted to gain power in politics. That's the cause of his "change of mind".
You're talking about a completely different situation. Vance wasn't in politics. He wasn't trying to beat Trump in a race. He was just giving his opinion as a regular citizen. Harris was trying to beat Biden to...
No, because he went from being vehemently against Trump, calling him things like "America's Hitler", to fully support Trump and sucking up to him, all because he wanted to get into politics.
If you can't see this, then you're just refusing to acknowledge obvious facts.
Let me stop you there. Using silly terms like this is the problem we're already talking about. Adding a new one in only makes it worse.
I'm sure you won't. But we're still explaining what's wrong with it, even if you refuse to listen.
No one paid that guy to kill Trump.
Calling them "godless"...
Not many people in Europe love Trump.
Translation: He loves Putin and wants to be just like him, so he cozies up to him. Which, of course, means he'd sacrifice Europe for Putin.
He does not. He cares about no one and nothing other than himself.
No one sees you as cannon fodder. But Trump is...
him being "automatically anointed" doesn't mean they didn't consider other options. It just means there were no other options that presented a better chance.
This isn't about my personal belief regarding Biden. I think he's done a good job, but I'd prefer to have someone younger. But all...
Then you aren't actually looking. You yourself are using it as a pejorative here. You called people "godless" as an insult, a negative. That's how it's generally used too. "Godless heathens" is a common term. Conservatives have used it to denigrate Communists and generally anyone they don't like...
Pretty much no one does. The difference is you want Ukraine to give in to Russia, while some of us want Russia to stop and go home. My way makes sure no more die on either side, too.
An incumbent generally doesn't go through that process. There would need to be an especially good reason, like the party thinks someone else has a significantly better chance than Biden.
Both. He's polled the best out of any of the realistic options.
I don't think they failed to consider them. I think Biden has consistently shown to be their best option, at least up until just recently. He was their best option last time, despite his age, and he's polled consistently the best of any options ever since.
I think if there had been a rising...