These modern-day microbes are really behind. Some other single-celled organisms managed to be elephants already! Oh well, maybe they would catch up someday. Wish them luck. :(
You told me before that you studied/taught the ToE for decades and I totally believe you, but that is irrelevant. Please don’t get me wrong, but my argument is neither about your level of knowledge or your job.
Science is ever changing. Science of decades ago is not science today. The question...
No, @ Neuropteron said, “based on his expectation that organic life was exceedingly simple. He lived in a time when people believed a brood of mice could suddenly appear in a basket of dirty clothes. In other words Darwin was under the illusion that life could appear spontaneously under the...
a) Not at all, I'm not the author (Shapiro). Again, the source is what gives credibility to my claim not the other way around.
Here are some quotes from the article:
“The format of the paper will be first to discuss in detail a few of the many well-documented cognitive abilities in bacteria...
Wordplay such as “an epiphenomenon of physical reality” wouldn’t resolve the contradiction. You argue that consciousness is somehow an outcome of a physical process and at the same time postulate that physical processes don’t imply consciousness.
You just play with words. Per your perspective...
Not at all. Not all changes are equal or follow the same principles. For instance, even so both abiogenesis and evolution are changes but it’s a lot different process.
You cannot equate the alleged evolution of the living to the material change of the nonliving. Material change follows the laws...
you know what really has no value? It’s empty denial without any justification.
It’s not that you don’t see value in arguing, you’re not aware of any justification for your empty denial. That is why you can’t argue.
I suggest you go back and read it again but let me try to summarize.
a) Changes within a population occur due to change to the frequency of gene variants (alleles). “Allele frequency” of a population is not a new or an increase of information, but rather alterations to information/genes that...
The article did demonstrate the argument against the MS. If you don’t understand it, you should be able to understand the abstract or the conclusions.
The article addressed the concerns/conceptual problems with the gene-centric view in biological debates about causality and the relationship...
Totally irrelevant, the transformation from bacteria into elephants has nothing to do with abiogenesis, it's about the alleged evolutionary process through random mutations and natural selection.
Latest scientific finds in the felid have nothing to do with my or your personal...
It’s only a baseless presupposition. The driving force that gave rise to the Islamic golden age was Islam itself. See the wiki link below under “Causes”
Islamic Golden Age - Wikipedia
The Islamic state embraced the Islamic principles of openness and tolerance, even so Muslims were the majority...
The specific timeline is irrelevant to the fact that the decline did take place and the golden age did make great contributions to humanity.
But such contributions didn’t end or stop with the decline but rather continued for many centuries after, as previously discussed.
Credible sources of...
Again, forget about the person and state your case. you can do nothing beyond some pathetic personal attack. I'm not your concern, your concern is the argument, but again, why I would even waste time explaining that to someone like you? you're not serious. you're here to merely kill some time.