So, your “contemporary sense” is that even if the essential qualifier for the ring species concept to have continuous gene flow around the ring cannot be satisfied, it doesn’t matter for you, it’s merely a little negligible matter but the populations complex would still quality as ring species...
Didn’t I advise you before to resist the urge to attack a person to compensate for your feelings of insecurity/inadequacy. Yet you as well as other fellow attackers insist to expose your vulnerabilities to everyone to see how pathetic you are.
The person’s attributes, intellectual level...
I didn’t accuse you of anything, I’m only asking you to respond to logic by logic. If your response is simply that this is the way you believe it (energy is involved) period. Then it’s not a rational argument. Would it make sense to you if I do the same?
You as well as other fellow Darwinists...
It’s relevant because you are the one who insisted that the ends of ring species are different species and you claimed it to be evidence of evolution. Simply, It’s not.
Pluto orbiting the sun is not an evolutionary process but rather a stable/fixed phenomenon that follows the rules of gravity...
No, the article adequately supported that position, the central tenet is not intact.
a) The article provided a summary of the MS assumptions on page 2 (P#1236). Here is the quote of third assumption.
“Third, following genetic change, natural selection leads to particular gene variants...
Agreed, the point is closed.
Sure, irreducible complexity postulates that the functionality of every single constituent of any living system is dependent on the other constituents and vice versa. It’s neither possible to exclude a constituent nor a constituent can be functional or evolve in...
I was addressing the declination of the golden age (from the 8th to the 13th century), at that time, the Islamic world was one of the largest empires in history. it was a Muslim empire that initially embraced “the true spirit of Islam”, the final end of that era was the Ottoman Empire that...
I don’t like to be harsh with anyone, but sometimes it may be a fair reaction to inappropriate or irrelevant approach of argument.
I understand you may be feeling lonely with some time to kill and need to get some attention or entertain yourself, but this is not the way, try to control the urge...
An apparent escape tactic after you realized that your logic is faulty, forget about my beliefs and address the argument if you will.
Evolution is neither common sense nor “energy is involved" explains anything.
Al-Ghazali was not a fundamentalist, he was an Islamic philosopher/polymath, the same article said, “the golden age did not slow down after al-Ghazali, who lived in the 11th century, while others extend the golden age to around the 16th to 17th centuries.”
Islamic Golden Age - Wikipedia...
That really defines you but It’s merely a pathetic attempt to escape the question, leave the nonsense aside and answer the question “what is the contemporary sense”?
Didn’t I advise you if you want your words to be relevant, forget about the person and address the argument? Don’t fool yourself; we all know that such approach is merely a pathetic escape. Now forget about the nonsense and enlighten us, how is Islam not creationism and how the scientific theory...
Its not about you or me, I gave you a reference.
I gave you a reference article published by The New York Academy of Sciences, and you gave me your subjective opinion. The fact that “you have no reason to believe” is merely your subjective opinion.
Is There Life After Death? | The New York...
I didn’t say that Evolution occurs in isolation. I’m saying that the survival of any organism whether an intermediate, transitional form, single-celled, multicellular, or any living system of any kind depends on complex interdependent constituents. The functionality of every single constituent...
Obviously, you cannot keep track of the argument. I’m not the one who claims that “perfection” in nature is the result of "planlessness" evolutionary process.
Perfection is a fact that we all can witness in nature (see #7724). Only an ignorant or incapacitated would deny it. The question is...