You are not only politically incorrect but are Constitutionally in error. The notion that only monotheism is legitimate is naive. condescending, and arrogant. Atheism, Native American theism, paganism, to name a few, are protected under the the First Amendment "practise" clause.
There you go with the capital letters.
Why are you wasting time with conjecture? It is like a cat chasing its tail - all seriousness for the cat but a hilarious show for others.
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/1380163-post441.html {post 144} is an answer to Mr. Spinkles regarding his remark which was quoted. Whether he meant God or god is immaterial since the documentation of any god was impossible to a large extent before the known writing of Egypt. Any trace has...
Hehehe. I even enforced the rules
I always was a sucker for the "red herring" and "strawman" especially when they showed error.
Another rule we had dealt with "empty" posts - "Hardly. " is one and "Um...no, it doesn't. " is another. Would you or Storm care to expand?
At the risk of being further off topic, There is no other monotheistic creation named God. The god of Judiasm and Islam are hardly the same god each having different behaviors abd different purposes.
Know any other gods named God? I would hazard a guess that it began in the King James Version.
But back to "The myth of God owes its origin to the Egyptian myths"
Is that quote, posted above, in contention?
Is it therefore a given that those in the article are more than "enemies" but are actual homophobics?
Should the Church of Latter Day Saints, for their substantial financial support, be added to the list?
The myth of God owes its origin to the Egyptian myths
101 Myths of the Bible was written in 1943 and republished by Sourcebooks about 2000.The author, Gary Greenberg, is Presidnt of the Biblical Archaeology Society of New York.
Arrgh! I thought is was that guy that was supposed to have taken down the walls of Jericho. HE arrived 3 centuries after the walls were already rubble.
The Top Ten Power Brokers of the Religious Right | Rights and Liberties | AlterNet
In a country where freedom is prized and equality a keyword of Constitutional law, would it not be an injustice to allow such as exemplified above the "freedom of religion" of a minority to co-opt what...
In a pluralistic society, respects comes hand in hand with the law that makes freedom of religion possible.
Respect, in this manner, does not mandate respect for the ideas held.