Crossfire, but dynamic change itself is permanent. And who determines the criteria for authentic Upaya to determine which Buddhist teachings are authentic for the purpose intended?
How can Buddhism be considered non-theistic when the Buddha's own supposed sutras talk about Avalokitesvara and Amitabha Buddhas supreme beings who literally save anyone who believes in them and chants their names??!! Don't all Buddhists know about them?!
How does the fact of impermanence or "emptiness" according to the Buddha relate to the actual NON-IMPERMANENCE of the physical world with its laws of physics, chemistry etc. If a person jumps off a building he will kill himself very permanently. If he doesn't eat he will very permanently die of...
Read it online yourself. It's there, especially chapters7, 11 and 12. There is in his view a stark distinction between the Veda religion and what is called Hinduism.
In reading through chapter 7 of this online English version of Satyarth Prakash we find that Dayanad Saraswati was very politically incorrect and had very strong opinions. He basically distinguishes between the authentic religion of the Vedas and the corrupted teachings found in everything else...
Marcion, are you arguing for the idea that the Vedas were somehow merging primitive polytheism with mystical monotheism? I have been asking Hindus why so many Hindus require the multiple deity system if all their orientation is to the single Supreme God whether named Brahma, Shiva, Vishnu...
I always understood that Sikhism sort of just appeared out of nowhere in the 15th century under the leadership of Guru Nanak and the developed subsequently under the following Gurus. But isn't it likely that there was some kind of religious ferment prior to the 15th century that was "pre-Sikh"...
I have been watching some interesting videos about the popular maligning of the Hindu movement as being far-right fanatical, etc. However, there are problems of prejudice by the old political establishment in India to de-emphasize Hinduism as much as possible, which is something that the Modi...
What I have been wondering about is how Hindus viewed the nature of ancient theology of the Egyptians, Romans and Greeks inasmuch as they had multiple deities. Insofar as the Bible is concerned, I'd be interested in how Vedic Hindus view the nature of the covenantal world of the Old Testament...
What does skin color have to do with this? In any case, you may have a point about projecting something onto something else in this case, the Vedas. I would like to see what a Hindu would say about your comments on the origins of the Vedas and the religion of the first Vedic believers. On the...
Is it OK if a ask what some might consider a stupid question? That's not a bad disclaimer I hope. Anyway, is there a way that Hindu teachings would differentiate between the avatar and the atman even with the named deities, on the one hand, and the religions of the Greeks, Romans and Egyptians...
Then I must restate that I am not imposing anything. I am simply trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together as an outsider. Please read my reply to Marcion. It's the same issue. And Dayanand Sarwaswati and Vivekananda are to be asked whether they did seek to change or reinterpret the Vedas...
I do understand your point, but then how do you understand the approach of people such as Dayanand Saraswati in asserting that the Vedas were solely monotheistic? It means simply that he did not see any problem, or that the Supreme God is too mysterious for our human minds. Did he want to...