• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Indagator

    Materialism has officially become dangerous in my eyes.

    How would i know? I am not even sure if there are orcs in Valhalla... Already answered above. If AI is self-aware and thereby have "free will" and not completely determined by nature, but have ability (because it is self-aware) to determine it self... i would say that if it is not...
  2. Indagator

    Materialism has officially become dangerous in my eyes.

    Supernatural must be beyond the laws of nature, perhaps it should not be deterministic and be self-aware. I think self-aware objects would be very unnatural. Light? Nothing special about it imo Dark matter? Nobody knows. Consciousness? Nobody knows. Mathematics are non-physical but not...
  3. Indagator

    Materialism has officially become dangerous in my eyes.

    Its incoherent because their atheistic arguments can easily be used against their own position.
  4. Indagator

    Materialism has officially become dangerous in my eyes.

    If we are talking about idealistic atheists, then all i can say is i find them very illogical. I am not even sure how to approach them (their ideas)... Materialist that believes in ghosts are even weirder, their views are internally incoherent that's for sure.
  5. Indagator

    Materialism has officially become dangerous in my eyes.

    At the moment I dont have a coherent definition for "non-material" that i would be satisfied with. But non-material=supernatural... i guess. I am sure there are differences, but i use them interchangeably.
  6. Indagator

    Materialism has officially become dangerous in my eyes.

    Materialism is a very dishonest position. No matte what we will find in the future they will claim it is physical. If Odin would rise up from Valhalla, and spirits of orcs would be running around i am sure materialist would still claim that they are somehow material.
  7. Indagator

    We don't need to take materialist atheism as a whole seriously.

    lol nice try thought
  8. Indagator

    We don't need to take materialist atheism as a whole seriously.

    my bad
  9. Indagator

    We don't need to take materialist atheism as a whole seriously.

    No the box would be observable not the cat in the box. One must open the box, or if there is multiply boxes one would have to find the right box, or maybe cat is not in boxes at all, it is in a refrigerator, or in a different dimension lol But that is beside the point. You said that you cant...
  10. Indagator

    We don't need to take materialist atheism as a whole seriously.

    what??? There is an empty box in front of us, you say that there is a cat inside the box, i say it is empty, then i open the box. Nothing there... i just provided evidence for "a negative", an empty box.
  11. Indagator

    We don't need to take materialist atheism as a whole seriously.

    I remember them. They are not as good as you think. His accent makes him sound clever thought. Imagen him having a redneck accent... lol
  12. Indagator

    We don't need to take materialist atheism as a whole seriously.

    I think idealistic atheists are less logical than the materialist and should be taking even less seriously. But this is only the case if one is atheist. Idealistic view are again more logical than the materialist one since materialists are actually some kind of Druids that believe that objects...
  13. Indagator

    Does a god exist?

    Maybe... who knows?
  14. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    Your attempt at sophistry failed. My question is not relevant at all to what you are trying spin here. So 2/10 i guess. lol
  15. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    umm i did not say anything of this sort, you are the one with black and white view not me ^^what he said :D
  16. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    Well... i mean, fair enough... sure they can think whatever they want. lol But wouldn't atheist believe in supernatural make his atheistic position more "shaky"?
  17. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    I am talking about atheists that are more on the logical side of things that are materialistic reductionists and are using (well trying to use) science to debunk theism. Not that "oh i dont believe in God but i believe in supernatural" kind of atheists. As for: "Why would their view be less...
  18. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    My original point stands. You are late to the party, we have already been through this in this thread :D
  19. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    Strange question, but well i dont know bunch of people in the comments under Sam Harris or Dennett video.... Free will is the result of consciousness and is a potentiality but most people are deterministic most of the time. Maybe in black and white world. I would say that my conclusion are...
  20. Indagator

    Do Atheists claiming truthiness on predetermined view?

    Are you sure you posted the right videos? They just trying to debunk dualism and that is not what we are talking about. I have not even made any claims about dualism as far as i remember. I cant rephrase any better than that. I apologize for terrible service in my thread :( You use "we"...
Top